Is it worth taking a ten-year-old Freelander 2. TD4 diesel engine. Prices and options

Popular last year car brand Land Rover stopped production of the Land Rover Freelander 2 model. Instead it is now Discovery Sport. And for those who want to buy a car from a previous production, only used models remain. Let's look at the main options for this instance and find out how to choose a used car.

A little history

The second generation version hit the market in 2006 and was in great demand until 2010. But then the manufacturer decided to make a slight restyling. This model can be identified only by optics and wheels, as well as body colors.

Those car enthusiasts who closely followed the development of this model range, know that the update in 2010 was cosmetic, but a new upgraded 2.2-liter turbodiesel unit was also installed. The 2013 model also underwent modernization, but there are practically no differences in appearance from previous years. Everything is inside and under the hood.

But everything here is not as simple as it seems. The company has been following an unpleasant chain of events since the late 90s. Land Rover's facilities were sold to BMW, which took several developments for the X5, followed by a third generation Range Rover of disgusting quality, and then the company was transferred to Ford. Ford began introducing new developments and innovations, but then the 2008 crisis followed and the project was abandoned. At the beginning of the 2000s, the brand could be compared to a talented child who loved music, but at the behest of his parents, he took up boxing. But, despite all the obstacles, Land Rover engineers were able to do something.

Salon

Driving the Land Rover Freelander 2 SUV you feel some kind of solidity. The controls are large, stocky, and the seating position is traditionally high. The door slams shut as if a giant were knocking his club on wood. At the same time, the high strength of the structure is felt. As for sound insulation, it is not at a premium level. Although it is difficult to compare with what KIa does.

The quality and finishing materials may seem cheap, and the plastic is very hard tactilely. But this is not so - everything is very pleasant. In general, the interior is quite austere and solid. Everything is done very classically. The eye in this interior stops at the instrument panel with a large color display. Here you can see temperature readings and other characteristics. In addition to the testimony trip computer, the Terrain Response menu is easily displayed on the screen. So, you can see the operating mode of the system and the angle at which the front wheels are turned.

See how this system works in the Freelander 2 SUV. The test speaks for itself.

Also, the potential owner will find something new in the cabin. steering wheel, handbrake, as well as an updated center console. represented by a seven-inch touch screen. The presence of voice control is pleasing, and Meridian sound is presented for music lovers. These are 11 speakers with a total output power of 380 W or 17 speakers with a total power of 825 W. Impressive? Great, but not available in the database.

Some people find the interior ergonomics unremarkable. But the car is simply amazing in this regard and is completely worth all the money invested in it. It's also the last of the true Land Rovers.

Under the hood

We are talking about a used Freelander-2 SUV, which means we need to approach the issue from this point of view. So, the car is not perfect. The diesel unit, namely with which it is recommended to purchase this crossover, was previously used on Ford Transit. And when the person who sells the car says that the engine has been tested by time, then you need to understand that the unit is very outdated. These engines were produced for years. But, of course, there is nothing terrible in this. The only thing is fuel consumption, like Airbus, and complex electronic components and the presence of a turbine will not allow you to drain diesel from familiar truck drivers.

In our country they offer the Freelander-2 diesel SUV. This is the already well-known 2.2-liter engine with a power of 160 hp. With. However, there is also a 150-horsepower unit with a manual or automatic transmission and a 190-horsepower engine. For domestic users, it is equipped only with an automatic machine. Both units produce the same torque. Both modifications have turbochargers with the ability to change geometry.

In models from 2013, engineers replaced the unit with a 2.2-liter diesel engine with a capacity of 240 hp. With. Now it is economical, powerful, with good traction characteristics.

Transmission

Warner is designed to be fast and responsive. But the box is also quite economical. For example, the torque converter lockup operation has a wider range. The developers have reduced the weight of the gearbox and optimized it internally. Mechanical box for this model, after modernization, it did not undergo any changes and remained the same as it was.

The car that was underrated

Yes. This is exactly the case. In the Top Gear show, the model was undeservedly rejected due to its inconspicuous appearance. But at the same time he is talented in other ways. The second generation is built on a rigid frame platform. Women's subframes are installed at the front and rear. The suspension is long-travel, simple and repairable. There are no problems with her.

Off-road, the driver will be helped by a unique electronic motion control system, as well as constant four-wheel drive. The price for the Freelander-2 SUV is quite reasonable and even affordable, if we talk about used cars.

Yes, owners talk a lot about electronics flaws. She is often wrong. It has already been said about the outdated engine; the sounds of the operating suspension will be heard very clearly. However, as far as appearance is concerned, we can safely argue. Fans believe that it is ideal: simple, brutal and laconic. Despite all those shortcomings, the car turned out to be a real fighter. And repairs (“Freelander” 2nd generation) with correct operation will come down to replacing consumables.

Specifications

Engine - 2.2 liters, 150 or 190 hp. With. Fuel consumption is 7.0 liters per 100 km. The transmission is six-speed automatic. The car can overcome fords up to 500 mm.

How to choose?

Let's talk about choice suitable car. So, the model was produced from 06 to 14. That is why selection options for secondary market so many. For the Freelander-2 SUV, the price ranges from 600 thousand for copies of the first years of production to 2.5 million rubles for the maximum configuration. But the cost is, of course, slightly overpriced. You should choose a crossover that is 3-4 years old and has a 2.2-liter simple turbodiesel unit.

The manufacturer offers a three-year warranty on the machine. When purchasing a three-year-old car, the buyer will definitely receive a service history. This, although small, is still confidence in the future. In terms of engines, the turbodiesel with a capacity of 150 hp is especially popular. With. It is better in terms of software, and the turbine is cooled with both oil and antifreeze. There is also a difference in tax.

What configurations does the 2nd generation Freelander have?

Among the configurations, three can be distinguished. These are S, SE, HSE. There are actually three engines to choose from. These are already familiar diesel engines, as well as a 2-liter gasoline engine with a capacity of 240 “horses”. The trim levels differ in interior materials, electronic functions and equipment, as well as exterior features.

Maintainability

Much has been written about the used Freelander-2 SUV; reviews, shortcomings - all this is very clear. Among the shortcomings is only the engine from Ford. But they recommend purchasing this particular diesel engine with automatic transmission. It is more economical and perfectly suits modern realities.

There will be no problems with the car. is not here and never was. Instead, there is a catalyst, so there are practically no problems. Both the engine and the transmission have a high service life.

Owners often write on forums about the used Freelander-2 model. Reviews do not actually note any shortcomings.

Many people manage to drive up to 300 thousand km without repairs. To do this, you just need to regularly change the oil, fuel filter and other consumables.

They often write about problems with a “burnt” transmission. They just result from the fact that the oil was changed irregularly. After 130 thousand, the manufacturer recommends performing rollers. These spare parts will be relatively inexpensive. It is also recommended to regularly change the lubricant in the transfer case. It changes along with the timing belt.

Used Freelander-2 SUV suspension: reviews, disadvantages

The owners claim the high reliability of the systems. It is very rare that someone writes that shock absorbers were replaced before 150 thousand. The struts and bushings are often replaced. But if necessary, the front shock absorbers still need to be replaced.

As for the brakes, only the pads are changed. Everything else has a high resource. The prices are quite low and escalating for those who buy such cars.

conclusions

In general, you can safely buy a used Freelander-2 SUV. Reviews and shortcomings show that the machine has been operated without problems for a long time. The owner is only required to comply with the regulations. This is a great car for those who know a lot about them.

So, we found out what reviews, advantages and disadvantages the 2nd generation Freelander SUV has.

The popularity of crossovers was exploding like an interceptor alerted, and cooperation with the Ford concern bore fruit: the use of the proven EUCD platform (aka C1 plus) and the experience of Ford managers made it possible to solve the long-standing problem of the reliability of the brand's cars. Indeed, in addition to the Freelander 2, many bestsellers from both the Ford brand (for example, Mondeo, Escape, Kuga, Galaxy and S-Max) and Volvo (S80, XC70, XC60 and V70) were built on this platform.

It is also worth noting that British designers managed to create a surprisingly balanced car that fully corresponds to the definition of “ compact crossover premium class, and at the same time not compromising the off-road image of the brand. And the price turned out to be not at all exorbitant (although, of course, budget models there was no way to attribute it).

All this allowed the company to proudly declare that it has a truly mass model.

Indeed, in just 4 years, production volume exceeded a quarter of a million, and by the end of 2014, more than 300 thousand Freelander 2 were running on the roads of the planet. The crossover also gained considerable popularity in Russia. But if you scour the Internet and see what the owners say about the model, it may seem like you are reading a collection of contradictions. For example, the reliability and quality of this car are both among the most frequently mentioned advantages and among the main disadvantages! So why is Land Rover Freelander 2 loved and criticized?

Hate #5: small trunk

Any crossover is bought as a universal car, and for a universal car it is important to be able to transport a significant amount of cargo. It would seem that such a solid and massive car (body length - 4.5 meters, width - 2.2 meters, wheelbase- 2,660 mm) and the trunk should be wow. But the first thing that reveals new owner, is that the luggage compartment is actually not that big. Well, let’s be honest: the Freelander 2 has a small trunk.

The cunning Englishmen write on the signs that its volume is 755 liters and, in general, they are not lying. But this is the entire volume, up to the ceiling. And if you measure it as we are used to, that is, to the glazing line, then exactly 322 cubes with a volume of 1 liter fit into the luggage compartment. Plus, the trunk floor is at a height “up to your waist,” so stuffing heavy things (such as a boat motor) into the trunk is still a pleasure.

The next disappointment befalls the owner of “Frilik” when he first tries to sleep in the car for the night. Well, yes, the rear sofa folds, but it folds in this way: first, the rear sofa cushion folds forward, then the backrest “drops” (more precisely, the cushions and backrests, because the seats fold in a 60:40 ratio). It turns out to be a platform with a flat floor, and that’s good. The bad thing is that the pillow folded forward “eats” at least 30-40 centimeters, and the length of the resulting platform turns out to be less than one and a half meters. In general, the married couple of Thumb and Thumbelina can spend the night comfortably, but I, with my height of 182 cm, cannot fit there even diagonally.

Love #5: appearance

In at least half of the reviews, external attractiveness is mentioned as a significant advantage of the model. Indeed, the appearance of the Freelik can be attributed to the absolute success of the design team led by Paul Hanstock: from any angle, the car is clearly recognizable as a representative of the glorious Land Rover tribe, and, despite the simplicity of the lines, it does not look like a gloomy “suitcase”. It seems like a typical middle peasant: neither small nor big, neither tall nor short, moderately brutal, moderately aggressive, but not without aristocratic elegance.

At the same time - a typical “unisex”. Behind the wheel of Freelander 2, an unshaven adventurer in camouflage, a manager in a business suit, a representative of the creative class in a youth outfit, and a fashionista in a dress from an expensive boutique look equally at home. And some similarity in the general outlines and pattern of the radiator lining with the Range Rover and Range Rover Sport is quite enough for many drivers of more modest cars, as soon as they see the “Friel” in the rear-view mirrors, to hurry to give way.

1 / 2

2 / 2

Hate #4: steering wheel and horn

And if they still don’t give way to you, then you need to sound your horn! Well, okay, this may not fit too well into the rules of good manners. But you never know there are situations on the road when you need to warn about your presence sound signal: either a careless pedestrian crosses the road in an unspecified place, covering his head with a hood and not looking around, then the driver of the Gazelle is trying to play the patrol ship “Selfless” and the cruiser “Yorktown” - that is, he is rebuilt using the “slow pile-up method”. And so you habitually bang on the steering wheel hub - and in response there is silence, because the horn is turned on by two strip-shaped keys located on the sides of this same hub. The only thing worse could be the “beep” at the end of the steering column lever...

The quality of the steering wheel upholstery also raises a lot of complaints, both leather on the top version of the HSE and plastic on simpler trim levels.

But in assessing the steering wheel itself, the opinions of the owners differ diametrically. Some people think that the steering wheel is too big and the cross-section is even, without the “ergonomic swells” so dear to the hearts of racers, but for others (including me), all this is just to their liking.

Love #4: interior and ergonomics

But the rest of the arrangement of the internal space of Freelander 2, as a rule, evokes only positive emotions. The materials are very high quality - leather, fabric, and soft plastic. Perhaps, by today's standards, the instrument panel looks rustic, but the digitization of both the speedometer and tachometer is perfectly readable both day and night. Everything is convenient, everything is at hand. Seats with adjustable lumbar support and electric drives are especially good.

1 / 5

2 / 5

3 / 5

4 / 5

5 / 5

The engine starts with a button. Nowadays this will not surprise anyone, but in 2006 such a decision was typical for much more expensive and representative cars. You need to get used to the fact that to start the engine you need to insert the key fob into a special slot to the left of the steering wheel, but this solution also has a very clear advantage: when the engine is running, the key fob battery is charged, and you don’t have to worry that in some way moment you will not be able to open the car because your battery is dead. Well, in case you left the car in the parking lot with the headlights on, drained the main battery, and the locks were locked in the “closed” position, the sting of a mechanical key is hidden in the body of the key fob. This will allow you to open the doors, pull the hood lock lever and “light” some compassionate Samaritan from the battery.

The review is also very good. First of all, because of the proprietary “commander” (more precisely, “semi-commander”, after all, this is not a Defender) landing. Many people consider the interior mirror to be too small, but this drawback is fully compensated by large mirrors, like those of a real SUV, and ultrasonic sensors and a rear view camera (which, however, is only available in top trim levels) help when maneuvering in a parking lot. And absolutely everyone likes exceptionally high-quality sound speaker system Meridian.

Hate #3: poor sound insulation

But here’s the catch: Freelander is still noisy. And it’s not the rumbling of the 2.2-liter diesel that’s annoying - although it’s not silent, it doesn’t rumble like a tractor. No wonder the vast majority of sales were made up of diesel versions. Moreover, in Russia they accounted for more than 95% of all Freelanders sold! But aerodynamic noise and road noise from the wheel arches, both rear and front, are quite annoying. You can, of course, take care of additional sound insulation, but this means serious investments, and most likely will not radically solve the problem. So most owners simply prefer to turn up the volume of that wonderful Meridian media system on a bad road.

Love #3: good handling and maneuverability

As expected good crossover, in terms of perception of the road surface, “Frilik” is absolutely omnivorous. Its suspension readily deals with gentle waves, small irregularities, and serious bumps and holes, without requiring steering. In fact, the car's handling deserves to be discussed in more detail.

On the one hand, there are crossovers that handle significantly better, especially on good asphalt - for example, BMW or Audi. But you also get much more tired in them, especially on long routes in the Russian outback, where good asphalt is more a rarity than a rule. On the other hand, the fact that there are cars with more refined and sharper handling does not mean that in the case of the Freelander everything is very sad. Yes, the car rolls in corners more than comparable sedans and hatchbacks, but these rolls do not go beyond the acceptable limits.

The situation with accelerating and braking dynamics also looks quite good. The six-speed automatic transmission provides exceptionally correct traction control, so the desire to switch to manual mode gear changes occur very rarely. Freelander accelerates very confidently, and you can get away from a traffic light even when much more powerful cars are standing nearby. Then, of course, they will catch up with you, but that will be later... In general, the accelerating “Frilik” resembles not so much a cannonball fired from a cannon, but an electric train starting off from the platform. It seemed like nothing had happened, and you weren’t pressed into the back of your seat, but the speedometer was already showing a hundred.

By the way, there is a certain ambush in this. In terms of subjective perception of speed, Freelander has two positions: “standing still” and “moving”. Both 20 and 120 km/h are perceived almost equally, and the difference between 75 and 85 km/h (which determines whether you receive a “chain letter” or not) is not felt at all. In general, for a long time, the Freelander's only rival in terms of ride comfort within the compact premium crossover segment was the Mercedes GLK.

1 / 2

2 / 2

Hate #2: Expensive maintenance

Just like cars with a three-pointed star, the Freelander is quite expensive to maintain, especially if you use the services of official dealers. All this is superimposed by the fact that for cars manufactured before and after 2012, there are different maintenance regulations, and, of course, in each case, separate ones for gasoline and diesel versions.

So, for pre-restyling cars, changing the oil in the transfer case, manual transmission and the rear axle gearbox should be performed with a mileage of 240,000 km, but since 2012 these operations should be carried out with a mileage of 130,000 km (except for servicing a manual transmission, the oil in which must be changed every 10 years, regardless of mileage). Conversely, before 2012, spark plugs were replaced at a mileage of 48,000 km, and after 2012 - at a mileage of 78,000 km.

And in any case, all this does not come cheap. For example, for cars manufactured between 2010-2011, the cost of maintenance with an oil change is automatic transmission with a mileage of 48,000 km it can reach 50,000 rubles. It is clear that the vast majority of Freelander owners are people, although not poor, but also not considered “masters of life”.

A natural process was the migration to the so-called “club” services, specializing in the maintenance and repair of Land Rover, but not included in the official dealer network. There they will clearly tell you that the engine oil needs to be changed at least every 12,000 km or once a year, and the automatic transmission oil needs to be changed at least once every 65,000 km. But the oil in a manual transmission, in the transfer case and in axle gearboxes (except for the rear one) can really be changed less frequently than once every 130,000 or 240,000 km, as prescribed in the official regulations. Fuel filter needs to be changed at every service, air filter- every other time, making do with checking its condition.

Love #2: even to Siberia!

If you treat your car with attention and love, then it will reciprocate your feelings. This is especially true for operation in winter, the most difficult period for all motorists.

Surprising as it may seem, a car designed in the British Isles washed by the warm Gulf Stream, and even equipped with a diesel engine, can easily be called one of the most “winter-resistant” models on our market. Firstly, all Freelanders were equipped with standard pre-launch Webasto heaters with remote start. They have their own problems: until 2013, the cars were equipped with rather fragile Webasto Thermo Top V, but after that came new (and almost eternal) boilers with an evaporative burner of the Webasto Thermo Top VEVO type. One way or another, with a working heater and relatively fresh glow plugs, the diesel Freelander 2 starts confidently even when the thermometer drops below 30.

But even after starting the engine, the owner of the Freelander will continue to enjoy life: he will not have to, cursing everything in the world, furiously rub the windshield frozen to the point of complete opacity. Just press the Prog button located on the center console, and the car will go into quick warm-up. The electric heating of the windshield and rear windows, washer nozzles and side mirrors, the engine will increase speed and the air conditioning system will operate at maximum power. Naturally, for the comfort of the lower back (and that below), you can turn on the heated seats. A couple of minutes - and the wipers will sweep away the melted ice from the windshield, melted windows will appear on the side windows, and the temperature in the cabin will rise to acceptable values. You can hit the road... And this despite the fact that warming up many diesel SUVs, even premium ones, requires at least 10-15 minutes.

Hate #1: and yet it breaks...

Still, the main stumbling block in evaluating Freelander 2 is its reliability. Literally everyone agrees that this model is the most problem-free in the Land Rover range. Maybe the fact is that although the car is equipped with a fairly large number of automatic systems, it is still not completely “electronic”.

But here’s what’s interesting: as I already noted, at least half of the owners consider the reliability of Freelander 2 to be one of its main advantages, but the second half considers reliability to be the most big problem. Indeed, the car has several generic sores, the fight against which almost no one can avoid.

At the turn of the mileage of 60-80 thousand km (sometimes earlier, sometimes a little later), you will begin to be annoyed by the hum that the rear axle. As a rule, the cause is the front bearing. rear gearbox. The “officials” will most likely offer you to change the gearbox assembly, and that’s 32 thousand for the gearbox itself, plus labor and fluids... In general, it costs a fair amount. Fortunately, specialized unofficial services provided them with the necessary tools and learned how to rebuild the gearbox, changing only the bearing itself and “disposable” parts. Such an operation costs 10-12 thousand.

Another common problem is the death of the intercooler pipes, which rub against adjacent metal parts, or even simply burst.

As a result, the engine instantly loses traction and begins to smoke, and either “POWER LIMIT” or CHECK ENGINE lights up on the display. This disease can be cured on your own, and a set of pipes can cost very differently: from 14-15 thousand for an original set to 1,500 rubles for Chinese analogues from Aliexpress. There are even originals that install pipes from KAMAZ, and what’s surprising is that everything works!

Well, other than that, the problems and the cost of solving them are not too different from other models. In general, all these really existing shortcomings cannot cast a shadow on the main advantage of the model.

Love #1: like a real “rogue”!

The main advantage (for those who understand) is the best-in-class cross-country ability at the level of “real SUVs” with transfer case and downshift. In any case, in terms of cross-country ability, Freelander 2 (naturally, on appropriate tires) is quite comparable to a standard Niva or Chevrolet Niva(and this despite the fact that it’s not worth even mentioning their comparison in terms of comfort).

It is worth mentioning here a serious ground clearance(220 mm - that's not a bug you sneezed at), and excellent protection of all units under the bottom of the car, and durable bumpers, and a diesel engine that provides serious traction at low speeds.

The main weapon in the fight against off-road conditions in the Freelander 2 is, of course, the proprietary Terrain Response system with the “Snow”, “Mud/Ruts” and “Sand” modes, which until 2012 were activated by a characteristic “puck”, and after that by buttons arranged in a row , as well as a hill descent assist system. I will not go into the intricacies of controlling the system and how it works, I will only note that it (in the case of the correctly selected mode) guarantees that ESP will not “strangle” the engine when you need to move with slipping, will not allow the wheels to turn , when it is really harmful, and will help deal with diagonal hanging.

Naturally, “Frilik” has its limits. For example, he really doesn’t like deep ruts, and if you lay the car on the hump between the ruts so that all four legs hang down, then you will have nothing left to do but run after the tractor. In general, when off-road, it is recommended to turn on not only Terrain Response, but also your head.

“Urban cross-country ability” doesn’t even need to be discussed: neither curbs, nor courtyards and parking areas covered with uncollected snow are an obstacle for this car.

To summarize, we can say that the new owner of Freelander 2 should prepare for certain financial costs (especially since since 2015, the only source of purchase for this model can only be the secondary market). Based on this, “Frilik” should not be bought with your last money, otherwise the owner may suffer severe disappointment. But in any case, there are still more reasons to love this car than reasons to hate, and financial investments it pays off with the amazing confidence you feel in any road conditions, and ride comfort.

Do you rather love or hate Freelander 2?

The start of production of the second generation Land Rover Freelander dates back to 2006. It is noteworthy that this model is not a global reworking of its predecessor, but is based on a completely new platform with an increased wheelbase, which made it possible to remove the main weak spots previous generation. The second generation is noticeably larger than the previous one, and the overhangs are short and quite high ground clearance further improved its off-road performance. At the same time, the suspension travel and torsional rigidity of the body were increased, the front and rear subframes were insulated through the use of special rubber supports, and gas-filled shock absorbers large diameters allow you to drive through almost any obstacles on the way without any problems, while maintaining the proper level of comfort. Unlike its “ancestor,” the new generation of “Freelander” was produced exclusively in the five-door SUV format, and the overall design was made in a completely new style, previously unusual for the company. More on initial stages development of the car, official representatives of the auto giant stated that the new generation will be much more reliable than the previous one, because the build quality will be given Special attention. It must be said that they kept their promise and the car turned out much more successful than the last one. But nothing ideal exists, so even the crowning creation of Land Rover engineers has its own unique advantages and disadvantages, which will be discussed further.

Specifications

Power units:
Gasoline: 2.0 or 3.2 liters, 240 hp. and 233 hp respectively*;
Diesel: 2.2 l., power from 150 to 190 hp*.
Dimensions (LxWxH): 4500x2004x1760 mm;
Drive: full;
Transmission: 6 manual transmission or 6 automatic transmission *;
Ground clearance: 210 mm;
Body type: SUV;
Number of doors: 5;
Maximum permissible weight: 2500 kg;
Tank volume: 68 l;
Trunk volume: 750 l. and 1660 l. with the rear seats folded down;
Suspension (front and rear): independent, multi-link;
Brakes: disc, ventilated.

* - data is specified depending on the configuration.

The main advantages of Freelander

Before we talk about the obvious disadvantages of this car, we will describe its main advantages:

High off-road performance;
Reliability of most nodes;
High level of comfort;
Excellent handling;
Pleasant appearance;
Ergonomic interior and high-quality finishing materials;
Excellent sound insulation;
Spacious interior and trunk;
Fuel efficiency, which is most pronounced in diesel engines;
Small transport tax;
High level of security;
High quality paintwork.

Main disadvantages of Land Rover Freelander 2006–2014 release

Automatic transmission;
Rear axle gearbox;
Silent blocks;
Radiator package;
Electrical;
Regular parking sensors;
Hanging bearings;
Glow plugs;
Standard Webasto;

Let's look at them in more detail:

Automatic transmission.

On versions with diesel engine, with frequent operation in low temperature conditions, a disease often manifests itself, the essence of which is the premature failure of the torque converter and the internal mechanisms of the box itself due to the strong thickening of the oil recommended by the manufacturer. Only using a thinner oil will help correct a factory defect.

Rear axle gearbox.

With a mileage of 100 thousand or more, as well as with frequent off-road trips, on many Land Rover Freelanders, owners begin to hear a strong hum from the rear gearbox. In this situation, possible reasons There can be two unpleasant sounds: the imminent “death” of the gearbox, or wear of the shank bearing. If in the first case the owner is doomed to quite expensive repairs, then replacing the shank bearing will cost you only a few thousand rubles.

Silent blocks.

Following vulnerable spot most often manifests itself at temperatures below -25 Celsius and consists of a strong creaking and rapid destruction of the silent blocks of both front and rear levers. Installing polyurethane silent blocks will help correct factory defects. Of course, if you manage to find them.

Radiator package.

On all 2nd generation Land Rover Freelander models without exception, operational problems include severe clogging of the radiator package with dirt. If you do not wash them properly at least once a year, then you are guaranteed to have problems with the operation of the cooling system, intercooler and air conditioning.

Regarding the electrics, in the car in question it will not be possible to specifically identify its weaknesses, because different owners have different problems in operation electronic systems. For some, for example, the front and rear optics bulbs constantly burn out, for others a frequent breakdown is a failure ABS systems, still others have problems with dashboard. Only one thing can be said for sure - if you want to buy yourself a Freelander, then sooner or later you will definitely encounter “glitches” in the operation of one or another system.

Regular parking sensors.

Due to the design of the machine, it rear bumper constantly throws dirt right in the place where the sensors of the parking sensors are located, causing either interruptions in operation or a complete failure of the entire system. This weak side It is also aggravated by the fact that these sensors themselves are very sensitive to the slightest dirt, so if you want to park with the help of parking sensors, wipe them constantly.

Hanging bearings.

On versions with powerful 2.0 and 3.2 liter petrol engines, a frequent breakdown is the rapid failure of the cardan outboard bearings. This problem was caused by factory miscalculations, as a result of which insufficiently powerful bearings were installed on these versions of the machines, capable of withstanding high torque and high revs. Fortunately, the cost of replacing bearings is low, and finding them in stores in more or less large cities is not a big problem.

Glow plugs.

Diesel engines themselves are quite demanding in terms of fuel quality, but they can still forgive the owner for using less expensive fuel. It’s a pity, but this does not apply to glow plugs, which can fail even on the first attempt to fill with slightly lower-quality diesel fuel. Also, even when using good fuel, in frost below -30 degrees they may simply not turn on, making starting the engine impossible.

Standard Webasto.

The standard Webasto is also very demanding on fuel quality. Moreover, its requirements are no less than the requirements of the engine itself. If you often use low-quality fuel, you may not even hope for the correct operation of this unit, and this can cause big trouble, especially in our harsh winters.

Plastic door sills and door sills.

Due to the design of the car, plastic door sills and door sills often break off. The problem is largely caused by the fact that the system for attaching these elements to the body is not well thought out and consists of several small, and far from the highest quality, pistons.

Weaknesses of Land Rover Freelander 2nd generation

Long engine warm-up and rapid cooling;
Insufficiently efficient operation of the stove, which is why the car interior takes a very long time to warm up;
It is very difficult to change the oil filter on diesel versions due to its location;
Difficulty in finding troubleshooting services;
High cost of spare parts and repair work;
Low liquidity in the secondary market, which causes big problems when selling;
The fabric of the chairs is susceptible to contamination, which is very difficult to remove;
Strong vibrations and extraneous noise when operating a diesel engine in subzero temperatures.

Conclusion.

Compared to the first generation of the model, Land Rover designers have made great progress in the production of expensive SUVs. The second generation became noticeably more beautiful and more reliable than the previous one, which had a positive impact on the overall image of the brand. But even the company’s incredible desire to give people a truly high-quality product was not successful, and the car did not turn out to be ideal in every sense. Yes, she is good, but she is still far from perfect. Land Rover Freelander 2, like other cars, has its pros and cons, and only you can decide for yourself what it has more of, just by getting behind the wheel.

P.S.: Dear car owners, if you have identified frequent breakdowns any components or parts of Freelander, please report it in the comments below.

Weaknesses, advantages and disadvantages of Land Rover Freelander 2 was last modified: March 17, 2019 by Administrator

This year, as you probably know, the seventh episode of Star Wars is coming out. I've already seen the trailer, and to be fair, the movie was damn exciting. From the first seconds. A variety of fights, spectacular action, lightsabers, and, of course, signature music. At the same time, it became known that the rights to create new films about the universe were sold to Disney. That is, old George Lucas is no longer in business. Yes, Disney, of course, are good guys, and their cartoons have recently practically erased the border with reality, but now I don’t want to talk about them. I want to remember everyone's favorite “Episode 4 - A New Hope”.

The main character Luke Skywalker decides to rescue the captured Princess Leia to the Death Star, a huge battle space station capable of destroying an entire planet in a few seconds. To get there, he and his mentor Ben Kenobi hire Han Solo, a mercenary flying on an old ship in search of easy money. And then the moment comes when the heroes make their way to the station, free the princess, and begin to escape, the chase begins...

Before us is outer space, strewn with fragments of galactic debris, through which Captain Solo is trying to escape from his pursuers on an old ship called the Millennium Falcon. This ship is clattering with recently replaced parts, the equipment is acting up, the side lights are constantly going out, and the pursuers in the imperial fighters are pouring fire on the ship from laser cannons. And the only way of salvation for the heroes is a hyperjump, which seems unlikely for a ship in such a technical condition. Princess Leia no longer believed in her salvation, but this old trough, which Han Solo, by the way, won at cards, barely functioning from the damage, takes aim, and - drum roll! - crosses several parsecs with a huge jump, saving the lives of the heroes. Amazing scene! Very tense! And now it’s time to talk about Land Rover Freelander 2.

You see, the British have been following an unpleasant trail since the late 1990s. They were bought first by BMW, which borrowed a few systems from Land Rover for its X5, released the abysmal third generation Range Rover, and handed the British over to Ford. The Ford people started to come to their senses and even began to introduce developments and innovations, but then during the 2008 crisis they also got rid of Land Rover. This brand has always caused me sincere regret. In the early 2000s, she was like a talented child born in the village, whose parents never gave her the opportunity to open up. It was as if he had a wonderful ear and composed beautiful melodies, but he went to the boxing section and received cuffs in the evenings, because his father was a brainless donkey who tried to realize his unfulfilled dreams on his son. But Land Rover engineers managed to do something even in those dark times...

There's a sense of solidity when you get behind the wheel of the Freelander 2. The buttons are chunky, the seating position is high, and the sound of the door slamming is reminiscent of a giant's club hitting wood - there is a feeling of solidity of the entire structure. Sound insulation, of course, is so-so by premium standards, and yet it is incomparable with plastic bags stuffed with potato peelings, which Kia uses for these purposes. Of course, you may think that the finish is not very in line with the latest fashion trends, and the plastic is too hard to the touch. But don't worry, I've already come up with a solution for those who are itching to touch something while driving: just sit a girl next to you. And the problem with plastic will be solved.

And yet we must admit that this machine is slightly imperfect. Diesel engine, with which it should be taken, they put it here from a Ford Transit. And when the seller tells you that this motor is “time-tested,” know that this should be understood as “outdated,” because it has been produced since 2000. There is nothing wrong with this, except that it will consume diesel fuel like an Airbus when climbing, and given the complex electronics and the presence of a turbine, I would not advise you to buy cheap fuel from a familiar tractor driver.

But here's what's interesting. For all its frankly unremarkable ergonomics, filled with hard plastics and unglamorous buttons, this car remains a stunning car. A real Land Rover. And one of the last. After all, Defender and Discovery 4 are considered dead. Only the Evoque and Range Rover will remain, but there is also a problem with them: the alpha males will mistake the first for a woman’s bag, and the second costs at least five, or even six million, if we are talking about a more or less decent package. By the time you save up for it, you will already have a dozen diseases of old age. Who knows, maybe that's why the flagship SUV is made so comfortable... Be that as it may, you are left with only the Freelander. It's a win-win option, I assure you. Now I will explain why.

If you dig deeper, this is perhaps the most underrated car in the history of underrated cars. The trio from Top Gear rejected it, citing its appearance and the lack of a girly squeak behind the wheel for first-time test-drivers. Maybe that's true. However, he has other talents. The second Friel has two rigid subframes - front and rear. It's easy to maintain and as strong as the Great Wall of China, with long-travel independent suspension, Terrain Response electronic off-road assistance, full-time all-wheel drive and a proven diesel engine. It also doesn't cost as much as a couple of Fabergé eggs, so you can buy it before you have gray hairs sticking out of your ears.

Yes, I know that there is no escape from unnerving electronics, which every now and then produce errors. I know that the operation of the suspension will be audible, even if back seat Vitas and Adele will be bawling. I also remember about the time-tested diesel engine, which I already blabbed about. But his “unattractive appearance”... This is where I will argue. I am so sure that this statement is wrong that even if a billion designers threw a gauntlet in my face, I would fight a duel with each of them to defend his reputation. Of course the Evoque is beautiful. And your wife would probably like to have seven of these cars in different colors - one for each day of the week. But let's be honest: now almost everyone uses the sugary pattern. Starting from Kia in their Sportage, ending with Land Rover itself with its new Discovery Sport. And Friel is not what a bunch of marketers saw him as. He is the way the designer made him. Simple, laconic, and very brutal. And while he may not be technically impressive on paper, take my word for it, he can play hard. Anyone who saw through the idea of this car will no longer sell it. Because for all his shortcomings, he is a real fighter, and he will not give in to difficulties. With a reasonable approach, this machine will get you out of trouble in a situation where there is simply nowhere to go for the tractor, and the only hope is in yourself. And when you drive on asphalt, it will inspire a feeling of confidence and security.

Which brings me back to the Millennium Falcon, the ship that Captain Solo flew in Star Wars. His equipment rattled, he was not endowed with ostentatious gloss and, let’s face it, in some places the design could have been better. But he had character, idea and strength. So which would you choose: an Imperial starfighter piloted by a clone, or the Millennium Falcon with Captain Solo at the helm?

Verdict: One of the last true SUVs from Land Rover.

Characteristics of Land Rover Freelander 2

Engine: 2200 cm³, 4 cylinders, diesel
Power: 150 or 190 hp at 4000 rpm.
Fuel consumption: 7.0 l/100 km (combined cycle)
CO2 emissions: 185 g/km
Transmission: automatic transmission, 6 speed
Fording depth: 500 mm
Maximum lift angle: 45°
On sale: from 2007 to 2014 (discontinued)

***

We select and service a used Land Rover Freelander 2

And now about choosing the car itself. The second Freelander was produced from 2006 to 2014 inclusive. Therefore, the choice of car on the secondary market is quite impressive. As well as the price range: from 600 thousand rubles. for cars of the first years of production up to 2.5 million for a car in the maximum configuration with near-zero mileage. However, the price for them is slightly inflated by resellers. Against this background, a car that is three or four years old seems like a reasonable choice. Moreover, it is with a 2.2-liter base turbodiesel. I'll explain why.

The manufacturer's warranty on Freelander is 3 years or 100,000 km. It follows that when purchasing a three-year-old, you, as a rule, receive a copy with a transparent service history. In a certain sense, this will give you confidence in the future. Such a car can be found on electronic platforms without going beyond the psychological barrier of a million rubles. Among the engines, the 150-horsepower turbodiesel has gained great popularity. In fact, this is the same unit as the 190-horsepower version (even the torque of 420 Nm is the same). Among the differences are the software firmware and cooling of the turbine (on the more powerful one it is carried out with oil and antifreeze versus only oil in the 150 hp version). And, of course, in tax - 3 thousand versus 9.5 thousand rubles. in year. As they say, the choice is obvious.

There are three main trim levels: S, SE and HSE. As well as engines: two diesel engines of 2.2 liters (150 and 190 hp) and gasoline (2.0 liters, 240 hp). The configurations differ in upholstery (leather, suede, fabric), equipment and exterior. Two types of transmission - six-speed manual and automatic with ComandShift manual shift function. Due to its efficiency (compared to gasoline engine) and greater traction, diesel versions with automatic transmission are more common. Let's talk about them.

Choosing a car in this design seems more logical given today's fuel prices. You may be embarrassed by the thought of the upcoming torment with particulate filter. But don't worry - he's not here. Freelander 2 passes European standards with the help of a catalyst. As for problems, it is worth remembering the old truth about the miser who pays twice. The engine and gearbox themselves are quite resourceful. Profile forums are replete with stories of caring car owners who have driven more than 300 thousand km without carrying out major repairs to the main units. To avoid problems, it is better not to limit yourself to a standard oil change every 13 thousand km. The fuel filter should be changed every 25 thousand km (5 thousand rubles), and the automatic transmission oil (10 thousand rubles) every 60 thousand km or even 50 thousand km, if you like to go outdoors more often than others. Often, problems with a “scorched” transmission lead to the replacement of the entire unit, and they are usually caused by old oil in the box and hope for a Russian one.

At 130 thousand it will be time to change the timing belt, and, of course, the rollers. The spare parts themselves cost about 5 thousand rubles, the work is paid depending on the effort put into calling services. You can meet 8 thousand. Also, when replacing the belt, it is recommended to change the oil in the transfer case, which distributes traction to the rear axle. It has its own housing, separate from the automatic transmission, and the oil here changes along with timing belt. The procedure will cost 7 thousand rubles.

As for the suspension, in general the owners note it as reliable. It is a rare case that someone changes shock absorbers before 150 thousand km. Usually the matter is limited to replacing stabilizer struts (a thousand rubles each) and stabilizer bushings (750 rubles each). When the time comes, be prepared to spend money on front shock absorbers: 9 thousand rubles. per piece from the officials or 6 thousand per pair from the same manufacturer in the online store. When approaching the mileage of 170–180 thousand km, there will be a need to replace the front silent blocks and ball joint. Many people also change the front control arms assembly (11 thousand rubles/piece for the original and from 6500 rubles/piece for analogues).

Of course, don't forget about the brakes. A set of front pads costs an average of 4 thousand rubles. (officials will take twice as much), 3 thousand will have to be paid for the rear ones. Official dealer not so generous in this regard.

Occasionally, troubles happen, the solution of which borders on stupidity. The problem is probably the servicemen's inattention to some details. For example, the hose leading from the intercooler to the throttle valve, which will cause a hum from the engine compartment when accelerating. It’s interesting that the auto center will charge 9 thousand rubles for diagnosing and eliminating this problem. But if you notice an air leak yourself, then you will need a piece of hose for 100 rubles and half an hour of free time.

July 16, 2018 → mileage 202,000 km

Part 4. 200000

Good day to all. A round number appeared on the odometer, so I decided to write another review.

About the car.

Let me remind you that the car was bought new, in May 2011, from an OD in Moscow, for 1.4 million. In the second configuration with some additional options installed. I am one owner.

Weekend car. I traveled on it almost all of central Russia from Murmansk to Abkhazia, from Brest to Mongolia. Regular autumn trips to Akhtuba. The car is good for long trips, no fatigue, I am very pleased with the high bus seating position and the collected but soft suspension.

For 7 years, the exterior and interior have remained virtually undamaged, with the exception of a few chips on the body and glass. The paintwork holds the blows of exploitation firmly. No comparison with my previous Lancer and Civic. In general, most of all, what I value in a car (which is why I bought it) is its solidity and brutality. Not a single cricket in 7 years, no rattling of the suspension, no creaking of cheap cardboard trim in the interior. Everything is made to last, all the finishing materials, the metal is unbreakable, the quality of the paintwork. Yes, in terms of design everything is quite modest, dull by today’s standards, but the feeling of quality, solidity, and comfort has not gone away. Yes, there are a number of shortcomings, but for me they are not significant. I don’t even notice anymore.

Operation did not cause any particular trouble, and for the first 5 years I generally only went for maintenance. The engine does not inspire enthusiasm with its power; it is still a diesel engine. He is valuable to others. The first and main thing is fuel consumption, which is 6.5-7 liters year-round. On a cruise, going 90-100 km/h when alone in the cabin and without cargo, the computer showed 5.6 liters. According to my estimates, the difference is twofold compared to the same gasoline version. I have a friend at work who has an Outlander 2.4, he has average consumption 12l. Thus, roughly, the savings over 7 years amounted to about 350,000 rubles. I fill up everywhere, but at branded gas stations. Several times I was forced to refuel at unnamed gas stations and 2 times I got caught. Once in the winter, at a gas station next to my GSK, where I had previously filled up a Honda without problems, I grabbed a summer diesel fuel in December. The second time was last summer in the village of Ust-Kan, Altai Republic. After refueling 20 forced liters, the engine began to smoke blue. On the climbs there was a smoke screen like from a KAMAZ. Even at idle there was blue smoke coming out of the pipe. That’s it, screw the engine, or the fuel, or the catalyst, I thought then. It blew by.

The second plus is autonomy. In quiet highway mode, the tank (68 l) is enough for 1000 km. Verified. 3. Torque. When you need to “whisper” up a steep rocky slope at minimum speed, for example, the engine allows you to do this without straining. In previous gasoline cars, in such cases, you had to turn the engine, forcing the suspension and tires of the car.

But there are also disadvantages. The first is to constantly monitor the battery. At first, in the first years, I dropped it to zero a couple of times. Those who travel only around the city on a diesel engine, and even if it has a Webasto-type heater, are favorites and frequent clients of road technical support services in winter. The battery does not have time to charge in traffic jams. And even with Frilov’s sophisticated intelligent battery charging system. People turn on the heating of everything and everyone, everything they can is plugged into the cigarette lighter))... My opinion, a personal passenger car on a diesel engine in the city and with “autonomy” is a hemorrhage and an irrational action, no savings. It will take a long time to write explaining the Webasto principle, but those who are in the subject will support me. The battery takes a very long time to heat up, and it is very good to use up the energy from the battery. Diesel is good for long highway runs.

The second problem is the problem of the plant in severe frost. For me, without pre-warming the Webasto, the engine started with great difficulty even at -15. I am not responsible for all diesel engines, but Frilovsky is a little gentle in this regard. Yes, it starts, but with wild vibrations, doubling, tripling, and a smoke screen. But, after warming up, the Webasto starts working half a turn. The problem is that, for example, if the frost is 35 degrees, there is a chance that it won’t start at all. This happened to me once in 7 years. In the January frosts of 2017, in a village, 600 km from Moscow... The car sat for two days in such cold, in the wind. The battery was almost empty (I didn’t know that at the time). I start Webasto, after puffing for 5 minutes it stalls as the battery drains and goes into lockout. Auto corpse. Only after charging the battery for a day did I start. And who else has dead spark plugs – that’s it, a tow truck, a warm garage, or wait for spring.

Anyone who drives a car little may not have time to switch from “summer” to “winter”.

Another minus, subjective. The car is parked in the GSK box. Walk from the house 15 minutes. In winter, when you need to warm up the engine using the autonomous system, you need to get almost close to the garage door to start the Webasto with the remote control. Previously, the brains did not catch the signal or interference. And here you are standing in the cold, early in the morning, in the dark, waiting, clearing the snow from the gate so that the car can warm up with preheating for at least 15 minutes. Those who have a car parked under the windows of their house do not have such discomfort, of course.

In short, diesel is more demanding of winter operation than gasoline; those who are constantly on their toes and attentive to their car have no problems. But, if I lived somewhere in the Yamal-Nenets Autonomous Okrug, or in the Republic of Yakutia in the regions of our Siberia and the Urals, I definitely would not have bought it for personal purposes. Spring-summer-autumn no problem. You even have to try to overheat it. And only those who did not wash the radiators from fluff and dirt in time overheat.

And definitely, I can’t say whether I would like the next car to be a diesel one... If the diesel version of the car costs less than the gasoline version, as was the case with Friel, whose new diesel version was much cheaper (like all other models of the brand), the diesel itself is good, as on Freelander, and the car is big and heavy - definitely yes. It’s pampering to have a car for personal use with a consumption of 15-20 liters. and more, I think.

Service.

5 years and 145,000 km. As I said earlier, I drove without any problems. In fact, I only did that. I change the filter myself and go to a specialized service center to change the oil. In ordinary eateries like “Express” they don’t even undertake to change it themselves, and you shouldn’t trust them. All because oil filter: 1. It is very difficult to get to it, 2. The design is not in the usual sense, I took it and screwed it on. Cartridge, in a flask-lid with a rubber seal. This elastic band is a delicate point. If the rubber band has a substandard cross-section (the left one), the oil will “fly away” very quickly. Wedge. Or, conversely, if the cross-sectional diameter is too large, the oil cartridge cover can be difficult to screw on, and unscrewing it is generally unrealistic, only by being overzealous and tearing off the key splines. Which is what they did to me once. Somewhere... I had to change this plastic “figurine” (3500 rubles)... There are no analogues.

I fill the oil with 5W30. Up to 150,000 km. there was no fuss at all. Now it’s starting to go somewhere around 0.5-0.7 liters per 10t.km. For the last 3 years I have been using Lukoil Lux. Before that there was OD Castrol, then Motul. I was recently in Pskov, bought NESTE at a branded gas station for 4 replacements, I fill it up now, I don’t feel any difference. I'm thinking of switching to 5W40 at 250,000 miles.

I changed the spark plugs once at 100 tkm, it turned out to be in vain (the battery died, Polish Varta) but it only caused a problem later. The spark plugs were working, but the intake manifold gaskets were installed crookedly. This came to light after 2 years, when the engine began to openly leak oil from the intake and the engine began to run rough. The battery was supplied by Exide.

At 120 t.km. I went to the Volvo service center for Haldex maintenance. With disassembly and washing.

Every 3 years I change the power steering fluid reservoir using the displacement method. Thanks to the club gurusJ Changed every 3 years brake fluid. After 6 years, I replaced the brake hoses. After 5 years, I changed the antifreeze and flushed the radiators. In general, there was no point in climbing, everything was clean there.

I also changed the oil in the front differential and gearbox once. In the box recently, at 175 t.km, basically in vain. The oil drained is of standard condition, transparent, homogeneous, factory red in color. According to the regulations, replacement is required every 240t.km. I filled it with non-original Mobil Mobilube HD 75W90, but I needed Castrol Syntrans V FE 75W80.

It can only be ordered using the original number. Mobile transmissions began to turn on poorly in winter. Later, after replacing the flywheel, I changed the clutches again to the original ones. I change the fluid in the rear gearbox every year, after winter. I fill it with regular mineral water Castrol EP 80W90, because there is no point in pouring good stuff in there. It will still buzz. The oil always drains inhomogeneously, cloudy, with water.

Regularly, once every 2 years, I disassemble and clean the mechanism parking brake, there is such a problem with these machines - we wedge them at the most inopportune moment. Corrosion... Like all free-drivers, the rear brake light leaked after car washes. I put it on sealant. I changed the rubber seals of the wheel arches, they dried out and lost their shape with the rubber seal of the trunk door of a VAZ-2112. Over the entire period, two summer and one winter sets of tires have worn out. Summer ones are almost zero, factory Good Year and its one set from the same company. Winter ones (Nokian Hakkapeliitta SUV 5) with %60 wear sold as used after 6 winters of use. In general, there is no wear on the rubber. Here is a summer one, I think with increased wear, according to my rough estimates, 50-55 thousand have passed. It’s a paradox, the tires wear down at an increased rate, but the brakes... All the original discs and front pads are still there. Rear pads changed at 135,000 km. The friction layer has already begun to peel off. But, I’m about to install everything new, purchased a long time ago, back at the end of 2014, at the old prices. I bought a lot then when everyone rushed to buy cars and TVs.

The shock absorbers are tired, the suspension is starting to pierce with a full load where it didn’t happen before. I think by 220-250 t. I’ll change the springs right away. The rest is still holding up, the only thing is a very slight play in one steering rod (it hit the curb once tangentially). Because of this, the steering wheel was slightly skewed. I drove like this until last year’s trip to Altai, where this joint surfaced. On the Moscow-Gorno-Altaisk section, the tires on one side were completely worn out. At the local tire shop they tightened up the wheel alignment. One of the rear wheels went a little further, but everything there was tightly soured, since no one had climbed there in 7 years. Now just use a grinder to saw and drill out the bolts.

Replaced the gas struts on the hood and trunk lids. I installed a Swedish analogue on the trunk, I was dissatisfied with it, although it was not much cheaper than the original (1250 rubles per piece). I decided not to go crazy on the hood and bought an analogue (2500 rubles).

In the 7th year of life, signs of corrosion appeared externally. The body is not galvanized, as far as I understand, and this makes itself felt. Firstly, the paint swelled with small bubbles (match head) under those chips that I did not notice in time and did not paint over with a pencil. Bubbles also appeared on the rear door drainage chute. Traces of rust on the arch of one left wheel (it was stoned). Processed... The trunk door under the molding is rusting, but here we “thank you” to the Krivoruk OD for repairs under CASCO after a small accident. I also tint it, it doesn’t spread yet. I want to anticorrode the side members under the bottom myself. So far they are the only ones that are corroding. And then we will see. The car, of course, runs all year round, on different roads, in the provinces the roads are still sprinkled with salt, and I don’t always wash them after that... Nothing lasts forever.

Breakdowns.

In general, the car had practically no breakdowns. Only in the 6th year and at the mileage of 150,000 did it suddenly pile up and hit the wallet noticeably. It was the summer of 2016.

Chronology.

38,000 - hood switch (500r). I changed it myself. Most likely, it was flooded with splashes during very heavy rain.

52,000 – wedge of parking brake pads in one of the wheels. On my way. The nearest service center took it apart and cleaned it. Follow-up complete disassembly cleaning the mechanisms of both rear wheels yourself

61,000 – the rear differential hummed. The most widespread and widespread disease of Freelanders. Done under warranty.

98,000 – the “gauge” burned out (18r). Do-it-yourself replacement

99 900 – repeated wedge of the parking brake pads in one of the wheels. Subsequent complete disassembly and cleaning of the mechanisms of both rear wheels on your own

110,000 – one of the car key fobs refused to move out of the lock slot without outside help due to “swelling” of the opening buttons. I bought an analogue on Ali (420r).

123,000 – failure of the trunk door opening handle. Also a common disease, “thanks” to FORD, from FF2-station wagon the part is one for one. Replacement on your own(2100rub)

143,500 – EGR valve cooler (RUR 32,500). A very tedious replacement, inaccessibility, soured bolts... At first, in one service, a scan showed an error on the valve itself, there was no doubt that it was the problem, EGR heat exchangers very rarely break down. I purchased an analogue of Piersburg (12000 rubles). When I went to change it, they changed it and the check did not go out, scanning again it turned out that there was an error in the heat exchanger. I ordered a part from Autodok, but when I brought it, it was the wrong one! It turned out that my restyled modification had a different EGR cooler, more complex, with some kind of vacuum machine. I had to be a little nervous and quarrel with the return and wait for the part with the correct article number.

144,000 – overrunning clutch of the air conditioning compressor. Overheat. Very rare breakdown, rare part, (RUR 15,000).

144 300 – air conditioning compressor. Overheating, wedge. (RUR 29,000). The saddest and most unpleasant moment of all time. The short story is this. In the spring of 1916, I went to one service (I’ll call it LR service) to flush the radiators, replace the belts with rollers, and at the same time they also changed the intake manifold gaskets. In June, on the highway, my compressor overrunning clutch rattled and it jammed, and the drive belt broke. Tow truck. At the LR service they install a new one, determine that the compressor is almost jammed, give it to me, I take it for repair to the AUTOMATIKA company on Krasnobogatyrskaya, 2. People, remember this office and never, NEVER go there! This is the only place in Moscow where DENSO compressors are (supposedly) repaired. These idiots, instead of repairing my compressor, sold me some kind of restored one, only they replaced my new clutch. There was a very long scandal, swearing, it’s painful to remember, I spent a lot of nerves then, I spat, took it, brought it to the service center, and put it on the car. I went home and the compressor only works when the car is moving. At idle, hot air comes from the air ducts in the traffic jam. I didn’t immediately contact this Automation... 2 months later, after a vacation and a trip to Astrakhan, I went to them, they did a diagnosis, and it turned out that I had... The radiator fans don't work at all! I go to the LR service center, and after a long search they find an open circuit. The wiring on the fan ECU was rubbed against one of the pipes. A curtain! My version. In the spring, when they dug into my engine compartment in this LR service with the analysis and removal of all radiators, pipes, belts, intake manifolds They assembled everything crookedly and this wire to the fans rubbed and rubbed for a couple of months until it rubbed out and the fans stopped working. The freon in the condenser began to cool down insufficiently; the pressure in the system was always excessive. So the compressor began to jam, and this caused the clutch to burn out. I traveled for half the summer with non-working fans, I even managed to go to Astrakhan and back! It didn’t overheat only because it was a diesel engine, it was a cold summer and there weren’t any traffic jams, all the runs were on the highway. The master of that service spent a long time making excuses and calling it all nonsense. Alas, the cause-and-effect relationship cannot be restored. He has his own version, I have my own... I didn’t find a single topic about broken wiring on the club forum. How did I manage not to notice that? So, the diesel engine rumbles so much that in the cabin, or outside, you can’t hear whether the fans are working, and they rarely turn on, the engine is cold.

At the moment, with the second, restored compressor, only God knows whether he managed to suffer too... And this situation does not make me happy at all. New set -65t.+10 work. Thoughtful.

158 500 – repeated hum of the rear gearbox. I went through everything in the same LR service (16000 rubles). This time it was done with high quality and very quickly.

182,000 – one connector fell apart rear light. More precisely, after the accident, when they changed the bumper at the OD, they apparently inserted the plug into the connector poorly; there was no plastic wedge-retainer at all when I climbed into it myself. First, I changed the turn signal lamp, it didn’t help, then I looked at the contacts, they were all oxidized and green. I cleaned it, filled it with electrical grease and secured it with a homemade wedge. As long as everything holds up, the flashlight is functioning.

198,000 – dual-mass flywheel (21,000 rubles). In principle, he himself hastened his death. In February of this year, after heavy snowfall, it skidded. After this, the stench from the burnt clutch and itching and vibrations on the pedal began to periodically occur when the clutch was depressed. Disc + basket (12000 RUR), release bearing (1000 RUR) were also changed. The disk was still alive. Plus, along the way, they replaced: the crankshaft rear oil seal (RUR 1,200), which began to sweat, the hydraulic release tube (RUR 1,000), oil in the box (RUR 4,500) and something else.

Summary.

A car with character requires some attention. If you take care of the car and treat minor corporate whims with restraint, then the thrill of owning a car is indescribable. Even when they were being transported by a tow truck, I couldn’t think of getting rid of it. Friel is like a family member to me. And the attitude towards him is corresponding. I don’t even think about changing it, what’s the point now? And for what?...

Would I buy it again now? At current prices, definitely not! And in general, I wouldn’t buy anything more expensive than a million and more complex than Duster. An irrational waste of money is the purchase of movable property. Already have other worries.