What is better Volkswagen Polo or Chevrolet Cruze. Chevrolet Cruze or Volkswagen Polo - which car is better to take? Comparison of Chevrolet Cruze and Honda Civic

Chevrolet Cruze has successfully taken its share of the market. It is a modern, reliable car with the makings of a sporty character. Despite this, there are a number of competitive machines. They have both advantages against the Chevrolet Cruze and disadvantages. As a result, the car market is constantly fighting between different cars trying to attract the attention of buyers.

Comparison of Chevrolet Cruze and Ford Focus

The Chevrolet Cruze has a number of advantages over the Ford Focus. By comparison, the main advantages are:

more comfortable steering wheel, especially compared to the Ford Focus 3;
good visibility from the driver's seat;
perfect steering rack design, which Ford Focus 2 cannot boast of.

Decide which car is best Ford Focus or Chevrolet Cruze, the choice towards the first is possible for the following reasons:

good suspension;
high-quality interior material;
effective soundproofing.

The cars are in the same price category. Their cost ranges from 800,000 to 1,200,000 rubles.

Chevrolet Cruze or Opel Astra

According to the reviews of car owners, the Opel Astra is prone to sensor failure. crankshaft. If it fails, the engine becomes completely inoperative. The meter is installed on the tide of the oil pump housing. It creates a synchronization pulse thanks to which the controller determines the position and speed of the crankshaft. Based on these data, it calculates the moment of operation of the injectors and the ignition module. Repair is possible only by replacing the sensor. Chevrolet Cruze is somewhat more reliable in this regard. The cost of the Opel Astra is in the same range as the Cruze of a similar configuration.

Cruz vs Toyota Corolla

The operation of Toyota Corolla will reveal the following features:

many childhood diseases;
the presence of crickets in the cabin;
high sensitivity of the engine to the quality of fuel and oil;
soft suspension;
the cost is higher than that of the Chevrolet Cruze, and ranges from 1.2 to 1.5 million rubles;
sufficient comfort.

Cruze or Skoda Octavia

A comparison of a Skoda Octavia and a Chevrolet Cruze is shown in the table below.

Comparison of Chevrolet Cruze and Volkswagen Polo

It will be determined which is better than the Volkswagen Polo or Cruz, according to the following advantages and disadvantages of the German:

the absence of "childhood diseases";
good cross;
cost less than that of the Chevrolet Cruze;
breakdowns of the rear suspension;
slow warm-up.

Chevrolet Cruze or Skoda Rapid

Comparing Skoda Rapid and Chevrolet cars, car owners note low reliability camshaft position measurement systems on the Cruze. In some cases, the engine continues to run, but there is a significant decrease in power and an increase in fuel consumption. Determining the problem is quite difficult. This requires a diagnostic scanner. The only way to fix the problem is to replace the sensor with a new one.

Comparing Cruze to Mazda

Chevrolet Cruze and Mazda are analyzed according to the main criteria in the table below.

Comparison of Chevrolet Cruze and Honda Civic

Honda Civic has advantages over the Chevrolet Cruze, which often has a failure of the air flow sensor. This leads to unpleasant jerks and dips in acceleration. The motor starts to consume much more fuel. Troubleshooting is possible only by installing a new sensor.

Chevrolet Cruze and Citroen C4

Unlike the Citroen C4, when a turbocharged Chevrolet Cruze engine is running, there are often extraneous sounds. The incomplete design of the Opel phase regulators leads to the fact that the engine is diesel. The resource of the cooling system pump is also small, so it starts to whistle at a run of more than 60 thousand km. These problems are extremely rare on Citroen.

At the same time, C4 often causes problems with the failure of suspension elements. The transmission is also not reliable. The cost of the car is in the range from 1.3 million to 1.8 million rubles.

Overview of other vehicles

Another car in a similar price segment is the Kia Sid. The machine is characterized by good handling and safety. Kia is inferior to Chevrolet in the reliability of the main components.

There is no definite answer which car is better than Chevrolet Cruze or Renault Fluence. The first has a more modern filling, and the second is a little more reliable.

Cruz replaced the Chevrolet Lacetti. The car inherited all the best design solutions of its predecessor. The main advantage of the Lacetti is its lower cost.

The quality of the main Cruze components compared to the Chevrolet Epica and Chevrolet Aveo is almost on the same level. At the same time, Epica has a lower cost. Experienced car owners, other things being equal, recommend choosing the Chevrolet Cruze.

Another competitor to the Chevrolet Cruze is the Kia Cerato. The car is characterized by dynamism and comfort. According to reviews, the quality of the Kia is slightly worse than that of the Cruze.

A very heated debate is going on between the owners of Cruz and Ford Mondeo. Both cars have similar characteristics and price segment. That being said, most drivers acknowledge that the Cruze's handling on the highway is better.

Comrades cruisers, I'm tormented in choosing a car ...

I settled on two models, this is a Chevrolet Cruze and a Polo sedan at maximum speed ... It is clear that in the Cruise group everyone will advise Cruz, and in the Polo group they will advise Polo, but I want you to give an objective assessment of these two cars!
Why exactly them? Appearance goes without saying, but the polo attracts with greater efficiency both in maintenance and in gasoline. Cruz like both externally and internally, and a higher class, but deters high fuel consumption (I plan to 1.8 engine). There are kosyachki on all cars, and even for a million or more, I just want to find the best one for myself!

Share your impressions, especially those who have been riding cruise for a long time, what is the consumption? How much do you drive on a tank (1.8 mt)? what bugs came out? Is it worth it for long term use? It is often not possible to change cars! Therefore, I plan to take at least 5 years ...

Ika (Jesenia) The car is in its 4th year, no complaints at all! In addition to consumables, nothing has changed, even the timing was changed to 90t. tf u tfu tfu.. Mileage 91000t Engine. 1.6 Full tank at 450km, which is very frustrating. Other than that, very happy with my choice.

Vadim (Jerrilinn) is it like driving a 450 with a full tank? I have a 1.8 140l cruise on the mechanics, I fill the half of the tank at 1000r shows 360 power reserve, this is to take into account that it is winter and a new car that has not been run in for a long warm-up at a flow rate of 11.2 in the city, and if on the highway I think 60 liters of a tank in the summer will be enough for 860 km.

Andrey (Jatin) Take Solaris, you won't regret it, well, or Cruz, don't think of polo, noble shit!

Yaroslav (Jilyen) Polo sedan is nowhere to be found except in Russia, it is sold and created exclusively for Russia. So it can be called nedofolz. At maximum speed is expensive for this class. Cruz is one of the most accessible in its class. At maximum speed it will be better equipped. If money allows, take 1, 4 turbo, 140 mares. Consumption is less than 1.8, traction is better. He himself wrote that Cruz is a higher class, which means more spacious inside. Cruz looks better, more solid both outside and inside. The volume of the trunk of the car is about the same. Gasoline consumption depends on how you passed the break-in and at which gas station you refuel. Having traveled on a polo, you will definitely want a car of a higher class, and most likely you will take class C as a result, so wouldn’t it be better to drive a C class car right away. Choosing between these cars I advise Cruz. Polo should be compared if with Chevrolet, then with cobalt. I drive an Aveo myself.

Roman (Suprasanna) Yaroslav, now there are discounts, here you can grab 1.8 mt for 620 thousand in the LT package, the polo with a premium pact is also worth it, it’s not enough for a turbo .. ((and it’s more expensive to maintain it .. And the polo sedan is sold in India and developing countries, just like cobalt, globalization is doing its job

Yury (Ilanka) What the heck do you fuck with this polo. cars are different. polo maintenance is equal to jetta maintenance. you need it. Get out of your head even the thought of buying this Foltz. http://auto-dealer.ru/articles/rating/? id=48539

Ika (Jesenia) Vadim, The fact that 1.6 has slightly more consumption than 1.8. Yes, and it was said about the urban cycle, traffic jams, etc. Much less on the highway. There is nothing surprising here
Yes, and I can’t crawl on my 1.6, I have to heat it up
As soon as I roll from a full tank of 450 kg, there are still 6-7-8 liter in the tank

Pavel (Amaranta) Came only from Belarus, round trip and there, mileage 3400 km, consumption there 7.5 l / 100 km at an average speed of 90-100 km / h (the road was not ah), return consumption 7.3 l / 100 km, average consumption for the entire journey 7, 7 l / 100 km. In St. Petersburg, the place is always somewhere around 9.8 l / 100 km mixed. Engine 1.8 MT Cruz. Mileage 52,000 km, almost 2 years. No complaints so far, I'm happy.

Tags: What better chevrolet Cruz or Volkswagen Polo sedan

VW Polo Sedan vs Chevrolet Cruze. New tire center Vianor. Repair: Give me a light! Driving School: Dangerous...

Autocovers eco-leather Arigon (Perm, Saratov) | Topic by Ndale

Installing covers Autopilot on Chevrolet cruze

VW PoloSedan HighLine (Polo sedan) vs Chevrolet Cruze (Chevrolet...

Jun 21 2010 - Re: Polo Sedan Highline or Chevrolet Cruze Cruz looks very impressive. Although I read the reviews, it is no better, but in many ways ...

Comparison of Chevrolet Cruze (2009-2012) 1.6 and Volkswagen Polo...

Comparison of Chevrolet Cruze (2009-2012) 1.6 and Volkswagen Polo sedan (2010-2015) 1.6 (105 HP)

Budget sedans in Russia are very popular. Interest in this type of body is difficult to explain rationally, but global automakers do not need this: they are simply sensitive to the needs of the masses. Therefore, the choice as contenders for the purchase of these models is not accidental. But if Polo is known to our motorists very well, then you can’t say the same about the American. Does this mean that he is not worthy of choice? We will try to find out in our small comparative review.

Model Features

Back in 2015, GM announced an updated version Cruze sedan, which became the second generation. Initially, the model was developed for the local and Chinese automotive markets, and in China the car appeared even earlier. From the sedan of the previous generation, the novelty differs in increased dimensions and a more aggressive and swift appearance, but Cruze weight even slightly decreased.

As for the updated Polo, designed to Russian market Initially, there are also enough changes here, but they are not global in nature. It can be noted more, both the engine compartment and the cabin. The battery has become more powerful, as has the starter, which is a pleasant trifle for Russian winters. Together with the increased diameter of the starting system wiring, these measures made it possible to ensure trouble-free starting of the motor at temperatures down to minus 35 degrees. In the base appeared heated steering wheel and seats.

Appearance

Although the second Chevrolet generation Cruze is available in three bodies, of course, we are only interested in a sedan. We note right away that its appearance looks very solid and modern, but without the newfangled sharp broken lines - they do not suit the sedan.

The front bumper has become significantly larger, in the middle there is a new-shaped radiator grill, divided in half by a narrow strip with a characteristic golden cross in the middle. The holes in the grille have become smaller, but this only improved the perception of the car. The front optics, according to the current automotive fashion, are elongated in length and partially go over the wings. At the bottom of the bumper there is a narrow air intake, and along the edges there are large niches with small foglights.

The sidewall has ceased to be absolutely smooth, but the relief is weakly expressed, from some angles it is not visible at all. The tailgate has been reduced in size, and now the brake lights have moved onto it. The shape of the rear optics is far from the correct shape and therefore looks interesting. Massive rear bumper does not have any bright details, but it definitely gives the sedan a more aggressive look. exhaust pipe not visible at all - it is hidden in the bottom.

The German sedan looks good too. But as far as aesthetics is concerned, this is not the component that is strong point Polo. Compared to the Chevrolet, the German looks a little outdated, and this "little" affects the time span of a whole decade.

Nevertheless, the car is perceived very positively, largely due to carefully calculated lines and proportions. Do not forget that a conservative approach to the exterior is characteristic of this German automaker, which relies on other advantages. However, the Polo body still has details dictated by the current fashion: these are, first of all, stampings on the doors and hood. But it must be admitted that they fit so naturally into the existing image that you don’t even notice them.

So on the outside Polo Sedan not a competitor to the Chevrolet Cruze, which does not prevent him from selling well.

Interior

It cannot be said that the changes made in the second generation of the sedan have greatly influenced the interior decoration. Common features with the predecessor have been preserved. Ergonomics has grown, but this is an evolutionary process. What do we have inside? The massive central console of a futuristic form attracts attention. Here is not the largest display of the multimedia system (seven or eight inches), below are the controls for the climate system, controlled by keys or washers.

The Cruze's steering wheel is a multifunctional, three-spoke steering wheel that doesn't cover the view of the instrument cluster, which also looks stylish with a small (4.2-inch) display in the center.

The convenience of the front seats is beyond doubt, they have an anatomical profile and pronounced lateral support, as well as adjustments in three planes. In older trim levels, there is heating and even a driver's back massage function.

Since the size of the sedan has grown, the back row is quite free, especially in the leg area. In class C, Chevrolet Cruze is one of the leaders in this indicator.

The interior is trimmed with textiles and leather, and the latter can change shape, adjusting to the anatomical features of the riders.

The trunk volume of an American is 450 liters, which is a good indicator.

The interior of the Polo, like its appearance, is conservative. Here, the German origin is felt literally in everything, especially in terms of ergonomics. All controls are located where they should be, everything is accessible, there is a sufficient number of niches and pockets, the instrument panel is very simple and informative, easy to read and interpret.

The driver's seat is also adjustable in three planes and six directions, but there is no back adjustment. But this is offset by the anatomical profile of the front backs. There is lateral support, but it is not expressed well enough, the chairs themselves are moderately hard, which, when sitting for many hours, is even better than soft seats with a vague profile.

The steering column is also adjustable in all possible directions, with no settings limiting the visibility of the tidy.

The only negative that can hardly be fixed is the insufficient height of the cabin. The width of the rear space is enough for three average passengers, but the average of them will have nowhere to put their feet - there is a high central tunnel.

Verdict - approximate parity with a slight deviation towards the Cruze - it is more modern and interesting.

Engines and transmissions

The second generation Chevrolet Cruze has already gained fame and popularity in many global markets. Despite belonging to the golf class, the sedan is moderately compact and economical. The base is a 1.4-liter turbocharged power unit with a capacity of 153 hp. from. It works in tandem with a six-speed manual transmission, but the automatic option is considered more economical. More voluminous 1.6-liter develops only 137 Horse power and can be aggregated with mechanics and a nine-band automatic.

Polo has three engines:

1.6-liter, with a capacity of 90/110 “horses”, depending on the boost, with a peak KM of 155 Nm at 3800-4000 rpm;
1.4-liter turbocharged 125-horsepower analogue (200 Nm at 1500-4000 rpm).

The 90-horsepower engine is paired with a manual transmission. All others can be equipped with both manual and automatic transmission.

By the power of power units Chevrolet comparison Cruze and Volkswagen Polo - in favor of the American, despite the poorer line of powertrains.

Dynamics, fuel consumption

Chevrolet Cruze with a turbocharged engine and mechanical box gaining a hundred in 8.1 seconds. In this combination, the consumption of gasoline is as follows: in the city - 8.3 liters per 100 km., On the highway - 6.0 liters, on average - 7.3 liters. With an automatic gearbox, acceleration performance deteriorates to 8.6 seconds, and efficiency increases (in the combined cycle - 6.09 liters)

The 1.6-liter turbo diesel is not as dynamic - 9.3 seconds, but consumes less fuel - only 6.4 liters in a mixed mode of movement with a manual transmission. The same consumption and the version with automatic transmission.

Volkswagen Polo noticeably loses in dynamics: a 90-horsepower engine with a manual transmission takes 11.2 seconds to pick up speed to 100 km / h. A 110-horsepower engine with a manual transmission does it in 10.4 seconds, with an automatic transmission in 11.7 seconds. And only the turbocharged unit overcame the landmark mark - 9.0 seconds.

But the level of gasoline consumption is less:

90-horsepower 1.6-liter engine - 4.5 liters on the highway and 7.7 liters in the urban cycle;
A 110-horsepower unit of the same volume - 4.6 liters with mechanics and 4.7 liters with automatic transmission on the highway and 7.8 / 7.9 liters. respectively in urban mode;
turbocharged engine: 4.7 liters with manual transmission and 4.8 with automatic transmission on the highway, 7.5 / 7.3 liters, respectively, in the city.

Draw your own conclusions.

Controllability

Since the engines of the Cruze are powerful, the sedan accelerates quite quickly, even when equipped with automatic transmission. The torque width is impressive, so even at low revs there is no problem with acceleration.

The tuning of the sedan's chassis can be called successful, at least the balance between comfort and handling is very good here. The steering wheel is moderately informative and responsive, there are rolls at high-speed turns, but they are minimal. The energy intensity of the suspension is not the greatest, but shakes only at low speeds and on roads with minor defects. Large bumps suspension swallows almost completely.

At Polo, the suspension was initially adapted to domestic roads. Therefore, small average irregularities are absorbed quite effectively, vibrations are not transmitted to the steering wheel. But it is not so difficult to “break through” the suspension, and from the point of view of acoustics, such an event will be accompanied by a decent sound in amplitude. And in general, the suspension does not work too quietly - it can be heard even on small bumps. This is not surprising - it is moderately tough, although energy-intensive.

In high-speed corners, the car behaves interestingly - up to a certain point, the roll is present, but within the limits of the norm for this class, but when the speed or angle of rotation rises to a critical level, the angle of inclination of the body, using the entire suspension travel resource, remains at the same level. This behavior takes some getting used to.

Comparing Chevrolet Cruze and Volkswagen Polo by driving performance, we can conclude that the cars are approximately equal, although the Polo has settings for bad roads.

Security

The new Cruze is equipped with a large set of modern ones, whose work is aimed at reducing the risk of critical situations. We are talking about row control systems, about assistants who monitor the movement of the car in difficult weather conditions. Equipped with an American sedan and functional airbags, manufactured with the latest automotive technology.

Volkswagen Polo has only the ESP system, everything else is passive SA: two front airbags, child seat mounts, etc.

Options and prices

The basic modification of the LS, which costs 790 thousand rubles in the version with a 109-horsepower engine and manual transmission, is equipped with the following options: an uphill assistant, six airbags, parking sensors with a rear camera, climate control, cruise control, power accessories.

The LT package, costing from 860 thousand rubles, is additionally equipped with a more modern multimedia system, a large number of parking sensors / sensors, and dual-zone climate control.

The top-end LTZ equipment costs 1.03 million rubles and has an expanded list of options: leather interior, a large number of assistants and security systems, push-button engine start, a modern music system with nine speakers and a subwoofer, bi-xenon head optics, electric sunroof.

As an option, you can equip the car with a splitter, door sills, another grille and a spoiler on the trunk.

At Polo, the base is a Conceptline modification worth 670 thousand rubles, equipped with a 1.6-liter power unit and a five-speed manual transmission. The set of options includes: ABS system, frontal PB, daytime running lights, central locking.

The Trendline package costs from 750 thousand, but here you can choose a more powerful engine and an automatic gearbox. Here, air conditioning and 15-inch wheels are added to the previous options.

The top version of Comfortline will cost you 805-890 thousand rubles, and for this money you will get a leather steering wheel, heated windshield washer, heated driver / front passenger seats.

Which sedan is better

If you have carefully read this material, especially the section on equipment, then for sure your conclusion will be unequivocal that the Chevrolet Cruze is better than the Volkswagen Polo in almost all respects. But why then does the German sell like a hot cake, but the American does not? First, the peak of Polo sales is in the past. Today's buyer counts and double-checks everything three hundred times before making the final choice, and more and more often it is not in favor of the Polo, as competition becomes more fierce every year. Budget new items appear more and more often, and Cruze is one of them.

Secondly, the factor of fame has a great force of inertia. Volkswagen Polo is a popular brand, unlike the Chevrolet Cruze, the second generation of which has only recently appeared. And if you ask the car dealers themselves, you will get a completely different assessment - the Cruze is growing in popularity, and the Polo is declining. Most likely, this trend will continue in the next few years - the American looks too tempting, whose top modification is equipped almost an order of magnitude better. However, it is possible that in a few years a new bestseller will appear on the market - the situation of recent years leads to such conclusions. In the meantime, we can unequivocally state: although the Chevrolet Cruze and Volkswagen Polo cost about the same, this is completely different cars, and the American's lead looks undeniable.

So, after a long time, I decided to leave. Background: I thought the throttle assembly, then to the sensors, it turned out to be in the ignition module, in the process the flywheel crown was worn out, the case of the gearbox housing in the starter area was accidentally broken. . Of course, I'm not the first person with whom this could happen at the most inopportune moment. But in my case, it was an option to change the position at work and life forced events! Now I am expecting a child and a wedding day, with which I can be congratulated.

So the money for repairs will not be soon, everything is for preparation and a loan for the car! Due to the hopelessness of the situation, a hole was dug. Of course, it is not over, but at full height (170) you can stand, slightly bending your head, under the car. The car was pulled from the house on a cable, but she did not want to start the option was 2 ignition module, fuel. This (2nd) time we were able to push the car in despite the rain, with the help of neighbors.

The pit seemed a little uncomfortable, or rather short for my car, I had to remember crawling with a machine gun under obstacles. Creeped back, and was glad that the suspension is not understated =) The starter was removed a long time ago. He removed the crankcase protection (What kind of rubber bands then remained, who knows where to shove from? Unscrewed the thrust from the gearbox (Do not believe it if you also subtract somewhere that you need to set the reverse speed and then unscrew the nuts from the wheels. I also tried that, the wheels are all- they spin anyway =)) The only thing you need is to mark with a strip where the connection was, I scribble straight with a screwdriver on the adhering dirt. Loosen the bottom cover of the clutch housing.

Unscrewing the wheels is not a problem, but I will remember the nuts for a long time! The nuts are specially bent so that they do not unscrew themselves. There were no suitable chisels in the garage, and a screwdriver and a chisel were used (the kingdom of heaven to them). Somehow I coped with the existing tool, but in the future I will wait for a small chisel =) Before the further procedure, a 2nd person is required, but where can I get him ?! =) I solved this issue by inserting L-shaped furniture keys into the disks. Next, it was necessary to find a head for 30! On the way to the store, I wandered home and found my father-in-law's (future) suitcase. From there I took (as it seemed to me then) a more convenient collar, a long handle at the end of the cardan. But in the process, he seemed fragile.

In the Internet, they also encountered the fragility of keys in the process of unscrewing such nuts. There were tips to buy a balloon key from a gazelle or a zil. In the morning I decided that if another existing key does not help, then on a planned trip, for army berets home, I will buy a new key. I took an ordinary knob (the head mount slides along the piece of iron). Fortunately, it turned out to be stronger, but how could I not jump on it (even the sole on the right boot came off =)! nothing worked.

The steering wheel, which turned easily with the drives and was difficult to control, further aggravated everything. Thus, the key constantly tried to scratch the wing Nut did not give in. I found some kind of tube 15-20 cm in order to combine the end of the key and the crowbar in it, but it only BUFFED =). I accidentally pulled out one of the neighbors and, fortunately, he had a water pipe. That's what helped me! I asked for the same from my father-in-law by phone (on ferrous metal).

Went shopping. I immediately drove home for shoes, at home my father almost convinced me that I needed a puller to remove the flywheel. Near the house I went into the fasteners, the nuts turned out to be 30 rubles each, I decided to postpone the purchase until the market. First I went shopping on an antoshka.

The first seller rushed about for a long time in search of a puller for the VAZ 2110 flywheel, and asked for help from colleagues. A little later, they realized that it was not needed there =) I decided to purchase, just in case, a puller for the ball joint, because the plan was to remove the drives! (as it turned out, you don’t need to press out your finger to remove it). What is not offered on the market. Some kind of soldier (which, as it turned out for the classics) in one place is 100 rubles.

But the seller didn’t find it at home, he sent 250 to the neighbors, they ask for a bolt in a long nut =), Elsewhere they explained to me that I don’t need it. A suitable puller for the ball joint turned out to be 100r cheaper than others (250r is also pressed out of the steering wheel). On the market, the nuts turned out to be at the same price as in the store and bought here. The next day, it was necessary to remove the front wheel drives. There are 2 bolts on each side. (only later I found out that it is not necessary to unscrew the nut from the finger =)).

Then laying all sorts of wooden bars. I pulled the drives out of the box with a metal spatula. It was not difficult to unscrew the box (3 bolts and 1 nut from the stud, which seemed to be welded into the box, but there was more). It's hard to take it off alone! After unscrewing, boards and a jack were placed under the car.

Slightly jacking up with all attempts to pull it off, something interfered. And then I remembered some kind of left support, which seemed to me to be right =) (and I didn’t see the point in unscrewing the engine.) You can unscrew the support in 2 ways a) unscrew the nut on top of the support and from below b) unscrew the mount on the box from the support 2 nuts with side of the wheel and 1a under the clutch cable attachment. I chose the first one. Further, the edge of the box was brought higher than the ball joint by how much and lowering the jack lowered the box onto the boards.

KNOW! Oil remains in the drain box, which flows out of the drive seals during removal. When removing the basket, I again encountered the problem of free rotation. But the strength to overcome it was enough only the next day. Lightly tapping with a hammer on the old wreath, he did not show off tears from the flywheel (without any chisels and drilling, which some resorted to!). On the same day, while the circumstances were developing successfully, half an hour before the arrival, I threw the flywheel into the freezer. And went to take a shower.

After a shower (min 20) everything was quickly combined and tapped. The next day I decided to install the flywheel and disassemble the box to separate the part that was broken, so it would be easier to transport. But nothing worked, the neighbor offered to wait for his friend, who said that it was NECESSARY TO RUN THE CHECKPOINT FULLY. There you will have to unscrew the tightly tightened nuts, and you need to do this together.

He finally convinced me not to unwind too much =) Taking the opportunity, I tried to take the box by car to the nearest service with argon. On the advice of a friend of a neighbor, there was a pensioner who cooks well, but I met an inadequate reaction from the workers there. Everyone didn’t care and I was immediately told that they don’t deal with argon now (probably they thought that they had to remove the box and it broke them) After a little persistence, one master broke off and chatted with some grandfather and finally said that there were no welders. Having driven around the district, in the garages I spotted an advertisement with a spray can. On this day, it was not possible to get through and the garage was closed. The next day, having withdrawn money, I walked to double-check the recorded number, got through, and agreed 100r / 1cm.

Since the car was already gone, I decided to bring the box on a TROLLEY =). While the time was drained gasoline from the filter to wash the weld and the fragment.

At the appointed time, I installed the manual transmission in the cart, turned on the 1st speed =) and on the gases! On the same day before work, they did not have time to finish welding due to the absence of the 2nd person (he swelled after the vacation). On the second day I took my miracle on the same cart =) this day was after the night shift, so I took everything to the garage and finished it. (according to cm there were about 10 but I said that more than 600r is not and will not be) Cooked more from the inside, outside only in the area where the starter does not touch. The next day, immediately after work, I went to Antoshka, the goal was to find a centering mandrel for the clutch, carburetor cleaning fluid (clean the box), and anther for the fork.

Having bypassed the whole Antoshka, no one had mandrels! (Someone made a remark, but who the hell needs them? Now the clutch comes complete with mandrels!) When leaving, I bought the cheapest carburetor cleaner 100r. (like an auto repairman), they asked for 50 for an anther. I went shopping, there I found an anther for 35, one mandrel for 50 and 150. Slightly doubting the proportions that they should represent, I went home on the way to fasteners. Similar proportions turned out to be in the version for 150r (3 levels), but in Krepezh for 150 they sold the same as for 50r (2 levels). It was decided to return to the first store and take for 50 rubles.

Only the edge was 15-17 and not 20. Later in the garage, the mandrel was checked and it turned out to be enough. Twisted the basket with the clutch. I started cleaning the box from soot and dirt adhering to oil streaks.

I didn't like the cleaner. I used ABRO in front of him, his pressure is 2 times more, you don’t need to rub anything, everything fell off almost by itself. (I used to buy the same 140r for 220 in fasteners) But still I cleaned it not bad. Gram 300 feel better! =) The next time I decided to install a box, even called a neighbor who had previously put forward his candidacy. But he didn’t succeed, he grabbed the oil level dipstick to pull up the box, then he excused himself that his wife was waiting for her to go.

Realizing an almost hopeless situation, I decided to strain under and think of something. First, I threw a box under the car on 1 piece of wood. Then, somehow, he threw the left edge onto the ball joint, and substituted a wooden block under the right one.

He put another piece of wood a little to the left and put a jack on it. Raising the left edge with a jack, I tried to push the edge further and further onto the ball joint, rearranging the bar before taking a breath =). Finally, there was nowhere to move the left edge, but there was a place to rearrange the jack closer to the right. Raising the jack managed to hook the box on the left support! It almost meant victory. Further attempts to match it with the engine failed until I decided to put a 2nd piece of wood under the engine and raise it with a 2nd jack /. After making sure that both jacks are strong, I unscrewed the support and began to loosen the 1st jack.

After the edge of the box stud appeared a couple of centimeters, I immediately put a nut on it and tried to tighten it. Mno did not begin to tighten until he had made other bolts. Only after that I screwed back the left support and pulled the box. At the place of welding there was a small depression under the starter, where I decided to cover it with sealant. Next time I had to kill a whole day installing drives! They exhausted me on a level with nuts =) I bought retaining rings for 3 rubles as it was written in the manual.

It’s hard to remember all the dances with a tambourine and obscene chants after getting out of a trance =) Plug the right drive into the box as much as it comes in, stick the second edge into the disk and screw it to the ball. Then, having made a wooden block with a chisel in size, he hammered the drive into the box through it through the nut (the retaining ring should go deeper and lock). After the hammer, you can twist the 2nd. After that, we tighten the ill-fated nuts and bend them in the slots. After assembly, I filled in the drained oil.

K. There is no money for a new one. There was not enough space on the blog for a picture of a bottle with a hose =) I tried to start it. The starter turns but the engine does not catch, from this I concluded gasoline or MZ (soldered). So the main goal of replacing the crown and welding the box is completed. Looking ahead, I’ll say that the filling of gasoline the car did not start = (a broken wire was again found on the module, which, even after soldering, did not give the same results (I drove 200 meters).

In the future, I conjure over the MZ until money appears, and then I will either buy the MZ or make God's spark (the same for the money) Article from the site: http://www.drive2.ru.

When choosing a brand and type of car, everyone is guided based on individual needs and habits, interests and capabilities. Therefore, what is good for one may not be good for another. When choosing a car brand, it is better to impartially consider the main characteristics and capabilities. Also learn about some of the disadvantages, for whom it is acceptable, for someone it is not.

production this vehicle concern General Motors. The development manager is Tevan Kim. The creation of this model was spent over $4,000,000,000. It appeared on the Russian markets in 2009, in Australia a year earlier.

Completed model servo. There is a high-quality anti-theft alarm system. 6 airbags: front; side and ceiling. According to EuroNCAP tests, the car received 5 safety stars. There are power windows. The salon is intended for 5 passengers, the front seat of the passenger and the driver is adjustable in height. The trunk has a volume of about 450 liters, but can be increased by folding the rear seats. Under the mat there is a spare wheel and the necessary set of tools.

Chevrolet Cruze equipped electronic system stabilization of the wheels, with the possibility of a short-term suspension of any of the wheels in bad weather conditions. Petrol 16 valve engine, with volumes of 1.6 or 1.8 liters has a variable valve opening time system. This applies to both the rich mixture intake phase and the exhaust gas exhaust phase, which reduces their toxicity.

This optimizes fuel consumption and increases vehicle power. The car can be equipped with a 1.4 liter petrol turbo engine or a 2.0 liter turbodiesel.

The German automobile concern Volkswagen has been producing this brand since 1975. Since then, they have been replaced by 5 generations. The latest 5th generation model debuted in Geneva in 2009. The chief designers of the firm were led by Walter de Silva. In Russia, it went on sale a year later. At the Kaluga Automobile Plant, this brand of car is assembled in a full cycle. Kaluga assembly Volkswagen Polo is designed for Russian climatic conditions and roads.

The car has a digital panel with a radio and a navigation system. In different trim levels, there are various seat options, in more expensive versions, the front seats are height-adjustable and heated. The steering wheel is adjustable in height and reach. All models have hydraulic power steering. The trunk has a volume 280 liters, and if the rear seats are folded, then 976 l.

The reinforced braking system has the function of maintaining directional stability, and there is also an imitation of a differential lock. There is tire pressure monitoring. There are models with roof rails that can withstand loads up to 75 kg.

Cars of this brand are equipped with 1.4 liter gasoline engines, or with a 1.2 liter turbo engine, 105 hp. This engine has a direct fuel injection system. The diesel version of the engine has a volume of 1.6 liters and a power of 90 hp.

In general, Polo is famous for its high efficiency, for example, in 2012 it was applied part-cylinder deactivation system. And the Polo BlueMotion model on German roads showed a consumption of 2.9 liters per 100 km, driving 1564 km at one gas station.

What do Chevrolet Cruze and Volkswagen Polo have in common?

If we take the engines, then their engine configuration can be almost the same, as well as the transmission. Either a 5-speed manual or a 6-speed automatic. Both cars are front wheel drive. Fuel consumption for both brands is about the same, depending on the engine.

In terms of design, despite the Russian assembly, both brands are not inferior to high style. This applies to how appearance and a cozy lounge. Both presented cars have many positive qualities. And the choice depends on the amateur.

What is the difference between Volkswagen Polo and Chevrolet Cruze

But they have a lot of differences, after all, the cars are different. If you do not rely on the comments of fans of certain models, then you can determine for yourself a more convenient and practical brand, not paying attention to the established tradition and fashion of certain styles.

Chevrolet Cruze has a large trunk for 44% , or 220 liters. The volume of the tank is more than 15 liters. The turning radius is also smaller by 6%, i.e. by 60 cm. Although the Volkswagen Polo usually has a more powerful engine, an increase in power leads to an increase in duty. For budget car this may be a disadvantage. Acceleration to 100 km / h at Polo is faster by 5.3 seconds, maximum speed more on 38 km/h. And the fuel consumption of German cars is less, although this parameter depends on the brand of the engine. Engine volumes are usually larger in the Chevrolet Cruze, although they are inferior in power.

Inside the Volkswagen Polo Russian assembly it is felt that the car is budgetary, the material is hard plastic, although it is in no way inferior in appearance. As for the interior of the cabin, this car does not cause negative emotions. Although it is a budget car. There is also a sufficient number of niches and coasters, decorated in a comfortable style. The rear seats, although smaller, have a good and regular geometry, which is convenient for long trips. There is a retractable cup holder, but compared to the Cruise, there are no pockets on the back walls of the front seats.

Of course, the Russian-assembled Volkswagen Polo is more adapted to our climate and roads. But the Chevrolet Cruze has a better chassis and better stability.

What is the best car anyway?

Here it is necessary to focus on the assembly of the car and where it will be operated. For a city car, a Chevrolet Cruze with a manual transmission is better. But for rural residents, or for trips to the countryside, a Volkswagen Polo with a gun, although it has a slightly smaller trunk. An alternative may be roof rails installed on the roof of the car.