Volkswagen Golf Mk IV VS Opel Astra G: who is more fun to live with in Rus'? Which is better Opel Astra or Volkswagen Polo sedan which is better Just a consumer approach to a car, I don’t go crazy about goodies and goodies, but I use them stupidly

Volkswagen Golf is a real legend, because this model For almost four decades, it has been the most popular of the entire range of the German concern. However, other automakers do not want to remain outsiders; everyone is making efforts to create serious competition for this hatchback; some, admittedly, do not succeed, while others, such as Opel Astra, luck smiles more. But which car is better?

Let's start by assessing the appearance of both cars.. Undoubtedly, old familiar features are visible in the exterior of the Golf, conservatism of lines and shapes, strict optics; there is, of course, a touch of modernity, but it is too insignificant. What cannot be said about the Opel Astra, this car can truly be called the most stylish in its class - fancy shapes, original headlights, smooth lines and aesthetics in every detail. Of course, it is quite difficult to evaluate the appearance objectively, so we admit that in our opinion, the Opel Astra looks prettier.

Now it's time to look into the salon and take an expert look at the interior hatchbacks that arrived to us from Germany. We are the first to sit in the Volkswagen salon; it is immediately worth noting the comfortable fit and high-quality finishing materials; the interior is not devoid of ergonomics; the space that gives additional comfort also deserves special attention.

The interior of the Opel Astra will also delight you with comfort, excellent finishing and quality of materials. The interior is not without modern details; we are now talking about chrome inserts. And of course, the ergonomics are top notch.

Now the most interesting thing is what's hiding under the hood, the inner potential that cars demonstrate only to a select few.

Motor Volkswagen line Golf includes three types of engines: 85- and 105-horsepower with a volume of 1.2 liters, as well as a 1.4-liter with a capacity of 122 hp. The manufacturer also offers three transmissions: 5- and 6-speed manual and 7-speed automatic .

The Opel Astra is again available with three types of engines: a 140-horsepower 1.4-liter engine, as well as a 1.6-liter engine with a capacity of 115 horsepower. and 180 hp. The choice of transmissions is not so great - the buyer can purchase this model with either a 5-speed manual transmission gear shift, and with a 6-speed automatic.

Naturally, we must admit that the Opel Astra not only looks sportier on the outside compared to the Golf, but also on the inside, since its dynamic characteristics exceed those of this Volkswagen model many times over. Therefore, if you love sports and speed, then you will like Opel, and conservative people who value, first of all, comfort and coziness will be able to appreciate all the advantages of the Golf.

It would not be superfluous to note that The basic Opel Astra costs slightly more than the Volkswagen Golf in a similar version - 649,900 rubles versus 599,000 rubles.

Of course, we only gave the dry facts of the Volkswagen Golf and Opel Astra, gave subjective assessments, naturally, it’s up to you to choose the best!

Many Russian car enthusiasts were faced with a choice: Opel Astra or Volkswagen Golf. But if earlier the first was exclusively a shadow of the second, today the situation has changed radically. Here, in fact, there is no need to prove anything - just look at the dynamics of sales volumes.

A modern vehicle is a means of information. Not massive, but quite useful. A fleeting glance at it is more than enough to draw preliminary conclusions about the character of the car owner. Especially when it comes to Golf. Experts are confident that a person who purchases it can be diagnosed immediately. Why? Because ignoring a wide range of analogues of various stripes and the desire to buy a new model, which differs from the previous one only in the numbers in the name, is the lot of men with a reputation. An accomplished and mature person is usually not inclined to be guided by such criteria as trend, fashion, style. The traditions of relationships are what is more important to him. Such car owners are constant and reliable in their desires. Just like Golf itself.

About success

The buyer persona described above can easily be classified as a “Mohican.” What is characteristic is that today they are in the minority, because the car they choose is not as popular as its sworn friend. It’s not surprising if you take a closer look at Astra. The current generation of this model has changed a lot. And for the better. And her audience, which was not particularly old anyway, literally became significantly younger. It is increasingly represented by creative people who are ready to keep up with the times, no matter what. But they are not devoid of rationality. In any case, they are definitely not going to shell out money for a foppish look.

Although, let's be honest, no one is calling for this. Because besides the design, Astra has something to please. In particular, basic equipment is a set of very useful baubles and chips. Opel, which will later be compared with Volkswagen, has climate control, a parking assistance system, a multifunction steering wheel, cruise control, a stabilization system and side airbags. In a word, because for Golf it is only available as an option.

Even something as small as a USB connector will cost a pretty penny. The manufacturer has provided for its implementation exclusively as part of an audio system, the cost of which starts from 7,000 rubles. On the other hand, the base Golf is equipped with seats with amazing lateral support. The owners of Astra will have to look for them again. And these searches will be crowned with additional expenses of 20,000 rubles. But some people think it's not worth chasing them. To say that they are wrong would be wrong.

About management

If you drive calmly, the Opelek accelerates perfectly. Even a six-speed automatic transmission can't prevent this. However, the power unit responds to the accelerator pedal with a delay. Therefore, you just need to push it through. In turn, the “automatic machine” also falls into some confusion. This is expressed in his throwing in order to find the appropriate pass for the situation. After which the car makes a somewhat nervous jump.

I really want to achieve mutual love from the steering wheel, but as the speed limit increases, the force grows somewhat weakly. The Astra handles corners very well. If there is a slipping of the front pair of wheels, then it is completely predictable. In this respect, Opel and Foltz are equal.

The steering wheel of the latter begins to get heavier with increasing speed. This only makes management more enjoyable. It should also be noted that it is quite sensitive braking system, which allows you to dose the applied force very well. And if Golf only needs light pressure, then Astra “likes it harder.” But it’s easier to get used to the latter, because at first the former tends to reduce the speed more sharply than you want.

Among the “similarities” we can also note the operation of the suspension. Although both models under consideration are equipped with fundamentally different systems. In particular, the Astra has a semi-independent suspension (+ Watt mechanism), and the Golf has a standard multi-link. Both of them absorb the flaws of the canvas quite well, without particularly informing the driver and passengers. True, if you come across a “lying” law enforcement officer, then the Volkswagen shock absorbers work “to rebound”, but it is unlikely that it will be possible to “break through” the Opel shock absorbers.

Despite the fact that Astra seems to be out of the shadows, Golf still stays half a length ahead. At one time, a slogan was especially emphasized, which stated that there is no point in driving something similar to a Golf, because there is a Golf! And today it is difficult to disagree with this statement, which, by the way, was invented by Volkswagen manufacturers. Summarizing what has been said, we can conclude: the classics still rule, gentlemen.

Once upon a time, the Volkswagen Golf was the undisputed leader in its class, and rivals tried to imitate it in every possible way. But today the market situation is completely different. Modern Volkswagen models are not as reliable, but competitors are clearly approaching. This can be clearly seen from the comparison example.

Smooth start

Both cars are assembled quite carefully, but individual elements of the Golf are fitted more precisely. In addition, its innovative door allows the outer skin to be removed in case of damage to bodywork, which allows you to eliminate traces of serious impacts. However, such repairs are more expensive and complex. Later in new Volkswagen models moved away from this decision.

In crash tests, both cars earned five stars, but a detailed comparison of individual points indicates a minimal advantage for the Astra.

The Astra, like the Golf, is carefully protected against corrosion. Weak point Opel fragment of the rear trunk door under the chrome strip. In the Golf, traces of rust can sometimes be found on the doors around the windows and on the pillars, where the door seal touches.

In terms of interior space, the Golf fares slightly better - it provides more space for rear passengers. The cargo opening of the 5-door Astra is slightly smaller than that of the Golf, but the trunk is more capacious: 380 liters versus 350 liters for the VW.

The quality of the interior finishing is controversial. The front panel of the Astra is not very impressive in its appearance and, unfortunately, creaks in most copies. After a slight modernization in 2007, the quality has improved and the finish of the Elegance, Cosmo and Sport versions already deserves respect. At first glance, the inside of the Golf is exemplary: excellent build quality and good materials. But if you look closely, it is not perfect. The rubberized coating will peel off on the power window control buttons and door handles. Well-equipped Asters predominate in advertisements for sale. Golfs, as a rule, have more modest equipment, but are more expensive.

Taking into account all the pros and cons, it is difficult to determine a clear winner in the first round. Both cars deserved a draw.

Point for Astra

Opel Astra has a very simple pendant: MacPherson system on the front axle, torsion beam on the rear axle. The ball and silent blocks in the front control arms can be changed separately. There is practically nothing to break in the rear beam. The big one dots the i's ground clearance. Thanks to all these advantages, Astra is ideal for our terrible roads. The service life of ball and other connecting elements is not very long, but replacing them is simple and cheap. The only exception is sports Asters with the IDS+ system, i.e. with shock absorbers of adjustable stiffness. There are no substitutes, and the cost of original spare parts is estimated at tens of thousands of rubles. But fortunately this headache only owners of sports versions. The rest can sleep peacefully.

The Golf's front suspension also does not cause any serious problems. A multi-link suspension is installed at the rear. Its construction is quite strong, but used copies initial period production will most likely require putting the suspension in order, which may cost about 6,000 - 7,000 rubles.

Golf equipped electric amplifier steering, Astra - electrohydraulic. Both systems are quite reliable, but in case of unforeseen malfunctions they can empty your wallet by 10,000 rubles.

In the chassis comparison, the Astra wins.

Motorized dilemma

Ruler power units Golf is impressive in its abundance. Unfortunately, the vast majority of available engines are modern and advanced designs that require increased costs on maintenance and repairs. The FSI and TSI designations hide the direct gasoline injection system. For car enthusiasts who consider costs, we can recommend only three engines: the immortal 1.6-liter gasoline 8-valve unit, the 1.9 TDI diesel engine (though it is too loud) and, as a last resort, the 1.4-liter 16-valve gasoline engine (nothing particularly impressive, but it doesn’t bother you too much with problems).

The Astra engine range is also impressive, but here the vast majority of engines can be taken into account. A good choice would be a turbodiesel borrowed from Fiat - 1.9 CDTI: powerful, economical and quite reliable. The 1.7 CDTI developed by Isuzu is not ideal, but many owners are still happy with it. The 1.3 CDTI is also borrowed from Fiat: it consumes very little fuel, but copes much better with the lighter Corsa.

Note: Most diesel Opels have a particulate filter. Its presence can be identified by a sticker on the center pillar on the passenger side. If the last line of characters displays the value 0.5, then the filter is present. If 1.2 or more, it means absent. Due to the fact that the filters are on Opel models create many problems during operation, some drivers remove them.

Opel Astra petrol engines are famous high flow rate fuel, average performance and good oil appetite. However, they do not cause serious problems. Typical faults connected to the EGR exhaust gas recirculation valve, throttle valve and oil leakage. After restyling, the manufacturer abandoned the use of hydraulic valve compensators (applies to strong versions of 1.6 and 1.8 liters). You can check this by deciphering the VIN number.

In this comparative stage, Astra wins, although it is worth recognizing that the two good engines for Golf (1.6 8V and 1.9 TDI) is quite enough.

Price issue

And now we come to the most important issue - price. Astra is definitely cheaper. Is it worth overpaying? In the end, best choice will become a more expensive Golf with an unpretentious and durable 8-valve 1.6-liter gasoline engine.

For those who prefer diesel, it is better to step over stereotypes and pick up an Astra 1.9 CDTI without particulate filter. It will be a well equipped car, usually much better condition than a comparable priced Golf.

Resume

The Opel Astra is technically less advanced than the Volkswagen Golf. However, she is declared the winner. Astra is cheaper and has lower operating costs. Drivers who often drive on rough roads will appreciate its durable suspension. In addition, during trips they will appreciate its economical, high-torque and not too noisy 1.9-liter diesel engine.

Volkswagen Golf V (2003-2008)

Model history

2003 – presentation

2004 – appearance of the 4Motion version

2005 – Golf Plus

2006 – CrossGolf

2007 – Golf Combi

:

Defects in cylinder heads and injectors in 2.0 TDI engines

Wear of the blade position control system in variable geometry turbochargers

Problems with timing chain and coolant pump in 1.4 TSI

Problems with the EGR valve

Premature wear of the dual-mass flywheel

Advantages:

Reliability

Slight loss of value

Availability of a wide variety of spare parts

Cons:

High maintenance costs for FSI, TSI and 2.0 TDI PD versions

Poor basic equipment

Engines

The most preferred are old, time-tested engines - a 1.6 liter 8-valve petrol engine with a power of 102 hp. and diesel 1.9 TDI with pump injectors with a power of 105 hp. The 1.4-liter 16-valve petrol engine is too weak, and the others require high maintenance costs. The version with 2.0 TDI PD is not recommended.

Technical characteristics of Volkswagen Golf V (2003-2008)

Versions	1.4 16V	1.6 8V	1.9 TDI	2.0 TDI
Engine	petrol	petrol	turbodiesel	turbodiesel
Working volume	1390 cm3	1595 cm3	1896 cm3	1968 cm3
	R4/16	R 4/8	R 4/8	R4/8 or 16
Maximum power	80 hp	102 hp	105 hp	140 hp
Maximum torque	132 Nm	148 Nm	250 Nm	320 Nm
Dynamics
Maximum speed	166 km/h	184 km/h	187 km/h	205 km/h
Acceleration 0-100 km/h	13.9 sec	11.4 sec	11.3 sec	9.3 sec

Opel Astra III (2004-2012)

Model history:

2004 – presentation

2006 – twinTop convertible

2008 – sedan version

Typical problems and malfunctions:

Wear of the dampers in the intake manifold of diesel 1.9 CDTI. The cost of a new collector is about 9,000 rubles.

EGR system failure - applies to gasoline and diesel engines

Malfunction of the CIM module under the steering wheel

Increased oil consumption for 1.6 and 1.8 l engines

Advantages:

Large selection of cars on the market

Very attractive prices

Wide range of engines

Good availability of spare parts

Cons:

Average reliability of gasoline engines

Slightly worse corrosion protection than the Volkswagen Golf

Quite a few cars from the corporate fleet

Engines

Gasoline engines do not impress with performance or fuel consumption. After restyling, the manufacturer abandoned hydraulic valve clearance compensators. Diesel engines are good, especially 1.9 CDTI. Note– among diesel versions there is a particulate filter.

Technical characteristics of Opel Astra III (2004-2012)

Versions	1.4 T P	1.6 T P	1.7 CDTI	1.9 CDTI
Engine	petrol	petrol	turbodiesel	turbodiesel
Working volume	1364 cm3	1598 cm3	1686 cm3	1910 cm3
Cylinder/Valve Arrangement	R4/16	R4/16	R4/16	R 4/8
Maximum power	90 hp	115 hp	110 hp	120 hp
Maximum torque	125 Nm	155 Nm	260 Nm	280 Nm
Dynamics
Maximum speed	178 km/h	191 km/h	185 km/h	194 km/h
Acceleration 0-100 km/h	13.7 sec	11.7 sec	11.6 sec	10.5 sec
Average fuel consumption in l/100 km

The love of our compatriots for sedans is incomprehensible and dimensionless. Implementation of ideas Volkswagen car The Jetta is named after a strong gust of wind. The fuller name of this wind current is Jet Stream, which can rush and reach speeds of up to 160 km/h.

Volkswagen Jetta or competitor Opel Astra cars were produced for markets in which these modifications are widely in demand. "Astra-Sedan" is a competitor to the "Mexican German". Although “Astra” does not have such a formidable name, it cannot be called a simple garden flower. This brand of car has long been accustomed to being considered a natural hatchback, although previously its name was called “Cadet”.

Named with all the traditions Opel Astra began to produce not only sedan and hatchback, but also offered two more forms: convertible and station wagon. Buyers now have a choice. German developers have created related sedan and hatchback models, but not for sales in their country. Of course, one cannot argue, they are available in German car markets and are in demand among the population, but not with such enthusiasm as their five-door relatives.

Astra and Jetta are produced and assembled far from their homeland, and this makes them similar, although the Opel Astra is dearer and closer to us, because These fast sedans are firmly entrenched near St. Petersburg, but the German still somehow attracts and attracts. However, enough ideas, let's move on to real characteristics and their discussion.

In order to objectively and impartially compare the Opel Astra (sedan) model and a similar version - the Volkswagen Jetta, we suggest that you first familiarize yourself with the main characteristics of the car.

General information
Model	Volkswagen Jetta	Opel Astra
Total weight, kg	2020	2065
Curb weight, kg	1375	1393
Dimensions
Length	4644	4658
Width	1778	1814
Height	1482	1500
Trunk volume, l	510	475
Wheelbase	2651	2685
Front/rear track	1535/1532	1544/1558
Clearance	140	165
Engine
Fuel supply type	direct injection and additional turbocharging
Volume, cm 3	1390	1364
Number of cylinders and their location	4, in-line arrangement
Cylinder diameter and piston stroke, mm	76.5x75.6	72.5x82.6
Number of valves	16
Engine power, hp	150	140
Speed ​​(max), km/h	215	205
Acceleration time to 100 km/h, s	8.6	9.3
Torque (max), Nm/rpm	240/4500	200/4900
Transmission
Gearbox type	6 speed manual/7 automatic transmission DSG	6 automatic transmission
Drive type	Front wheel drive
Fuel consumption according to standards 93/116/EEC, l/100 km
Capacity fuel tank, l	55	56
Urban cycle, l	8.1	7.1
Suburban cycle, l	5.2	4.6
Mixed cycle, l	6.3	5.5

Opel Astra or Volkswagen Jetta: choice of heart or mind

Let's look at the advantages of each car separately and find out which is better: the Astra hatchback or the Jetta sedan. Let's start with perhaps the most popular model. Volkswagen Jetta meets all buyer expectations. Design ideas are based on the rule of the rectangle. The panel, buttons, screen and the entire interior consist of rectangles and regular lines. If Volkswagen's creators were based on Euclidian geometry, then the volume buttons and climate control knobs would become the same shape as the entire interior. But reason won, and designers used compasses, and not just the straight and angular objects of mathematics.

Also, the designers created an outlined visor dashboard and the scales on it. Classic won. Rectangular LCD display on the panel, like iambic tetrameter from Pushkin's works. Many will ask: “Is it convenient? - Certainly! Boring? – it can be worse! Qualitatively? – perhaps!”, although the neatly joined panel of soft plastic evokes affection, despite the simple lines in the interior of the car.

But if we talk about doors, then this is a purely Mexican trend. An unpleasant and depressing impression is left by such errors as, of unknown origin, substitute leather for upholstery or careless joining of a window sill. The sound that occurs when the doors are closed cannot in any way be attributed to German production technologies; it feels like there is a lot of space inside the panels, through which the wind calmly walks. Uncomfortable, don't you agree?

Comparing which is better today: the Jetta golf-class sedan or Opel's Astra, then compared to the first option, the Astra is attractive and charming. Smooth lines in interior design make your head spin, enveloping curves add zest, and lighting at night conveys mystery and enigma. This car can, it would seem, be safely called “premium class”, however, if you come up and take a closer look, the fairy tale will end! The quality of the plastic with ridiculous shiny edges leaves much to be desired.

It is also unclear why the “bed” on the front panel is arranged, consisting of as many as four knobs, with rotating mechanisms, and several dozen buttons on the console. On-board electronics are not acceptable for such cars; managing and using them is irrational, ineffective and difficult. The four-position nipple, hidden in the washer, which, in turn, reacts and rotates with any wrong movement, is inconvenient; any mistake in searching for the required function - and all efforts are in vain, as they say. This is not from the modern era, and is clearly not suitable for advanced car enthusiasts. The conclusion suggests itself: the Jetta sedan is an excellent player, but makes adjustments from another parallel reality with unusual elements; Astra does not reach the required consumer level, but it is worthy of respect for trying.

Opel Astra or Volkswagen Jetta: who is more hospitable?

Volkswagen Jetta. The spaciousness of the lounge and sofa amazes with its splendor and luxury. We can safely say that this car can be classified as a model of the highest classification. The unexpected freedom for legs and knees is stunning. I just want to ask the tallest person, two meters tall, to sit down and evaluate the geometry of the Volkswagen. They invited, asked, sat down - appreciated! Not a single complaint was received.

However, if three passengers sit on the sofa, then comfort will drop, and the center tunnel will get in the way. This is the price to pay for such a luxurious Volkswagen all-wheel drive platform. But the “shoulders” don’t feel tight anywhere, the rear doors are equipped with comfortable armrests. If there are two people sitting, not three, then there is more than enough space. Plus a wide inter-seat armrest to better appreciate comfort. Unfortunately, for passengers sitting behind the driver, the convenience ends there.

Opel Astra. In the rear there is a retractable container and a 12-volt socket for passengers. The seat can easily fit three oversized sedan cars. But getting three guests into the back seat is already a feat; the roof, covered in hatchback style, and the incredibly high threshold are hampers. It won’t be possible to fall apart “Volkswagen-style” - the large armrests get in the way. And that's not all the difficulties. There is not enough legroom, and this is all due to the fact that it is poorly positioned wheelbase. Conclusion: for transportation in comfort, the Volkswagen Jetta is preferable.

Which is more spacious and practical?

Let's take, for example, an ordinary resident of a metropolis who left the store with purchases. He has a long item in his hands, and at the same time it is very heavy, which must be placed in the trunk of the car. So, which car will be a real helper in a difficult situation: the Jetta sedan or the Astra hatchback.

Aster. In order to open the trunk, you can choose two ways: find the required button on the key and press it, or open the car doors and look for the desired button on the console. Of course, in order to perform any maneuver, you will have to leave the purchase and start opening the trunk. Somehow it’s not very convenient, right?

Jetta. Everything is much simpler here. The button for opening the trunk compartment is located according to the classical scheme, but the vehicle still needs to be removed from the alarm system, otherwise nothing will work. You can also open it from inside the car itself. The only advantage over the Astra is that the cargo compartment lid does not bounce off, but rises smoothly and moderately. The rain is not scary, is it convenient?

In order to transport long items, both vehicles are equipped with hatches. However, there is a difference. In Opel, a triangle suspended on a hinge makes it possible to open, in Volkswagen - on plastic in the hands of the car owner. For those for whom the hatch alone is not enough: for the Jetta, pull the handle from the cargo compartment of the car and, using muscle force, push the back of the seat; for Opel, everything is simple and clear, in the spirit of European traditions.

Opel Astra or Volkswagen Jetta: engine - power

For those who save money, both cars have units without an inflatable version with a volume of 1.6 liters, which can be operated either manually or automatically. Although the Astra engine is tens of times more powerful, the Jetta is fast. The Jetta boasts fast hydromechanics, 1.5 seconds faster than the Astra. A person who buys a car for driving must pay special attention for turbo engines, which must be of the same volume. When buying a Volkswagen Jetta, you can choose between two versions: a turbine engine with 122 or 150 horsepower.

It is worth noting that any of the versions makes it possible to squeeze the clutch yourself or leave this work to a box with a multi-disc dual-clutch module. If you look from the point of view of comfort, all this is useless, but if you are a fan of a good ride with a sharp lead from the start, then this option is most suitable for you. The start without axle boxes takes almost 10 seconds, and in more powerful versions – in a little over 8 seconds.

How will Opel manufacturers answer us? A turbo-four in terms of power can only be combined with a 6-speed hydraulic mechanism; lovers of dynamic driving should tune the engine and gearbox. But any version, even the most sophisticated one, is much inferior to the Jetta. Astra's record is 9.2 seconds to 100 km/h, more modest than the Volkswagen model.

Opel Astra or Volkswagen Jetta: better on corners

Volkswagen Jetta. Any driver of this brand should always remember which engine is under the hood. A thoroughbred lever with excellent elastokinematics - intended for countries developed in the field of auto civilization. A naturally aspirated, archaic engine - for a quieter ride within ordinary Russian cities, but no one bothers you to drive fast. The sedan is endowed with the rail confidence of a multilink, which allows you to drive confidently and purposefully. However, you should not trust electronics, the best thing is concentration, it will not interfere.

Opel Astra. The mechanics are simple and independent of engine power. Even the most powerful models are equipped with a semi-independent circuit with a drawbar, which is reliable and convenient, and much better to control. Opel will not make mistakes, but it won’t be much fun either.

Opel Astra or Volkswagen Jetta: bumps and unevenness on the road

The Jetta sedan tends to react sharply to bumps and convey similar feelings of discomfort to its passengers. The harder the wheel hit, the more shaking there is in the cabin. It is not recommended to buy special discs to travel comfortably, because... unpleasant sensations are directly related to the amount of space occupied in the car. But the suspension is surprising, it is better than its analogues and glides over uneven roads as if on waves. The microclimate is also not very pleasant; in cold weather, the first 10 km will be torture. Further - better, but not much.

Astra is the antipode of Volkswagen in a sedan body, since the stove works better, potholes and bumps are nothing to worry about, which means maximum comfort for seated passengers in the car. But there are also unpleasant moments. Transparent, even too transparent, wheel arches. And this car is noisier than the Jetta sedan. If not for these two shortcomings, then Astra would have won a well-deserved victory.

Opel Astra or Volkswagen Jetta: testing

Both cars are tested according to the European regulations protocol, i.e. the car is hooked onto a catapult, reaches speeds of up to 65 km/h, and there it is, a barrier to impact. And both cars passed this test perfectly. However, there were some nuances: Jetta showed best result when colliding with a barrier and won in the “child safety” category, and the Opel Astra excellently withstood a blow from the side. All this happened on top level. In terms of general safety, the Astra is equipped with a stabilization system, but you will have to pay a tidy sum for “curtains” (this only applies to the Opel Cosmo). For Jetta purchasers, all air races are available at Trainline.

Opel Astra or Volkswagen Jetta: cost and equipment

As advertisers say, for a fancy Opel, the buyer will have to pay about 675,000 rubles. This price includes: mechanics, basic engine power with a 1.6 liter engine capacity, 4 airbags and ESP, an air conditioning system, heated driver's seat and front passenger, front electric windows, steel wheels, more or less an audio system and an alarm system. For the Jetta sedan, you will have to pay a more significant amount - 702,000 rubles. Astra-Cosmos with a turbo engine - about 913 thousand. What is better is up to the buyer to choose.

The choice is yours!

In general, there are many options for purchasing models with various functions and packages of additional services; everyone chooses what suits their finances, but do not forget about style. The intricacy and complex structure of both cars makes it difficult to fully understand the cost of one or another model. The Jetta sedan is better and more expensive, but not much, while the Astra has a balanced price tag and, moreover, a rich arsenal of bells and whistles.

For the car market, a more independent model is the Jetta sedan. And this is not surprising. The Latin American German outpaced Astra with disciplined driving to take the win. Astra, in turn, presented itself better and more worthy, delighting many with its good smooth ride and sophistication of design ideas, because showed a natural reflection of all the advantages of the car. The main thing is that Opel has achieved its advantages thanks to a reasonable price and available configuration. It is worth noting that Russian assembly played not the least role in the matter.

Who do you prefer to live together? Beautiful, smart, with excellent manners, but high expectations, or modest, quiet, but very reliable? It's about about used VW Golf 4 and G.

Evolution and Revolution
Golf 4 appeared on the market in 1997. The model, compared to its predecessor Golf 3, is evolutionary. There were no fundamental changes in design, and, by and large, in technology too. But this did not stop the car from being successfully sold around the world.

A big step forward for the company. A completely new design that has nothing in common with the previous Astra, and most importantly - a 12-year warranty against through body corrosion.
Both cars sold well in Russia, so the number of “our” copies on the market is quite large.

The Golf was produced in three- to five-door hatchback and station wagon versions. Warranty against through body corrosion - 12 years. For paintwork - 3 years. These deadlines are quite realistic, and there are no problems with the body. On some machines, water flows into tail lights, but the problem can be easily dealt with with a tube of sealant and skillful hands. The Golf's interior looks very luxurious for a small car. No one has yet surpassed the quality of fit of the panels and the materials used. You can play the game "find 10 differences from the VW Passat." Difference number 1 - tight back seat. Despite the assurances of the designers, sitting there is worse than in its predecessor. Not enough legroom, cramped shoulders... Even the VW Polo is more “friendly” to rear passengers!

Visibility is not bad, but the right mirror was created at the request of “substituted” on the roads. It is small, and it is almost impossible to see the obstacle on the starboard side. The undoubted advantage of the Golf is its equipment. Buyers both here and in Europe rarely ordered basic Golfs. Climate control and all kinds of heating are the norm rather than the exception. And at night, VW pleases with stylish blue-red instrument panel lighting. What can be broken inside? The cup holder and rear ashtray rarely last more than a year; during inspection, it doesn’t hurt to check their operation. As well as the serviceability of door locks. They often “glitch”, and branded service stations only fix them by replacing them ($70 for a lock, $45 for a replacement). The Golf suffers from the fact that the filter in the ventilation system is too good. It needs to be changed ($50 filter, $10 replacement) twice a year, in autumn and late spring. One Russian summer clogs it completely, and instead of a powerful hurricane, miserable breezes blow through the deflectors. Window and headlight washers are not long-lived. The lever axles in the windshield wiper mechanism become sour, which leads to damage to the electric motor or drive parts. To prevent disaster, it is better to disassemble and lubricate the mechanism once a year. A couple of years ago, gray dealers imported a batch of cars intended for the Turkish market. It is better to avoid them and check the VIN code of the body before purchasing. It can be used to determine for which importer the car was manufactured.

With the Astra model, Opel for the first time gave a worthy response to the VAG concern. Same 12 year warranty against perforation corrosion and 3 years on paint. And the same confidence in fulfilling these standards. Even the oldest cars do not show signs of corrosion. It's not just a matter of galvanizing the body. Opel rarely rots on the outside, they usually rust on the inside and along the welds. In Astra G, all hidden cavities are treated with anticorrosive at the factory, and welds are carefully sealed. If the car does not get into a serious accident, it will live for 20-25 years before being written off as scrap.

The Astra's interior is also good, but after the Golf it is not impressive. There is no chic in it, no shine in the little things. And the finishing materials are inexpensive. In addition, over time, in some machines a genetic code called a “rattle” makes itself known. Not a Kadett, of course, the Golfs will be quieter. But the back seat of the Opel is much more comfortable. There is more space there, and two people will not dream of any Vectra and Omega.

On the short side, the Astra's "Golf" mirror provides limited visibility. Wide rear pillars bodies make you nervous when driving in reverse. Astra wins in trunk volume. The Astra station wagon is perhaps the best “cargo carrier” in this class.

The weaker the better
The Golf 4 engine range has little in common with the Golf 3. The base engine is an aluminum 1.4-liter, but the most popular one has a displacement of 1.6 liters. Most of these cars are like this. Much less with 1.8 and 2.0 engines. The “five” 2.3 and the “six” 2.8 are exotic, but there are a lot of diesel engines. On cars of this class, VW diesels are the best in the world. And this conviction cannot be spoiled by any Russian diesel fuel.

There are no problems with gasoline engines. If not replaced in time air filter($25 - filter, $10 - labor), there is a chance to get acquainted with the price of an air flow sensor ($300). The lambda probe ($245 - part, $20 - labor) and spark plugs ($45 - kit, $25 - labor) suffer from our gasoline.

The 1.8T engine is close to replacing the turbine in 50% of cases ($1400 - part, $165 - labor). The pleasure is not cheap, so when diagnosing, special attention should be paid to this node. If the machine is less than three years old, the manufacturer pays the full cost of the part. This gift is called post-warranty support and is valid at all branded service stations.

It is recommended to change the oil for gasoline engines every 15,000 km, and the timing belt ($140 for belt and rollers, $110 for labor) - every 90,000 km. It is better not to reach this deadline, but to replace it a little earlier. There have been troubles in the form of valves “kissing” pistons, and it’s not worth repeating other people’s mistakes. Engines 2.3 and 2.8 have a chain drive of camshafts.

Diesel engines are only 1.9-liter, but there are plenty of power options. The basic atmospheric engine develops 68 hp. With. It does not have a turbine, the degree of boost is low, so it is not as picky about the quality of fuel and oil as its powerful brothers. VW turbodiesels are fantastic units in terms of acceleration dynamics and fuel efficiency. However, they need to be monitored. Checking the oil level daily is mandatory. Motors do not complain of a lack of oil appetite even in infancy, and topping up between maintenance is not a sign of a “tired” unit. Fuel filter($25 - filter, $10 - labor) is changed every 30,000 km, but it can and should be done earlier. It makes sense to change the air filter ($30, replacement $10) every 10,000 km. Otherwise, you will need to replace the air flow sensor ($300 sensor +30$ labor). Any VW turbodiesel is critical to the quality of oil and fuel. And don't forget about the timing of oil changes!!! In our conditions, the manufacturer recommends doing this every 7,500 km. For comparison, in Europe “oil maintenance” is sometimes extended to 50,000 km. Our measly 7,500 km indicate that there is too little fuel in our sulfur at gas stations.

A separate topic is “fresh” diesel engines with pump injectors. For them there is a special approval for oil quality, and it would not hurt to introduce one for fuel. One pump injector costs about $1000. Conclusion: refuel only at “targeted” gas stations and keep receipts. Typically the TDI from Europe gets crazy mileage. 300,000 km for a three-year-old car is a matter of course. Gearboxes on VW Golf are the simplest. Either a manual transmission or a conventional automatic. At the end of the day, a 6-speed manual was installed on the car. They do not have any typical malfunctions, only on the 1.6-liter engine the manual gearbox sometimes fails. Symptoms: increased noise, vibration.

The power units are no less. From the weak 1.2-liter to the powerful 2.2-liter. All of them are four-cylinder; there were no six-cylinder engines in the range. The basic 1.2-liter was not in demand in Russia. But it is found on cars from Europe. There is no need to be afraid of him. As a ladies' option on three-door hatchbacks, it looks convincing. Fuel consumption is low, there is a timing chain in the drive, and as for the dynamics... you need to be calmer, calmer.

The most popular engine in the Astra is the 1.6-liter 16-valve. But popular doesn't mean best. Our gasoline often causes spark plugs to fail ($12 per set), and the injection system is weird. By the way, to change the spark plugs (every 40,000 km), you need to remove intake manifold. Sometimes there is an increased oil appetite, which is eliminated by expensive (up to $800) repairs. Its 8-valve brother is not as powerful, but much easier to operate. Among the common diseases, the exhaust gas recirculation valve ($145 - part, $25 - replacement) and the valve idle speed($110 - part, $25 - labor).

Our fuel causes them to become clogged, so experienced owners remove and clean them every 20-30 thousand. Then you don't have to think about replacement.

Failure to promptly replace spark plugs on all engines can result in failure of the ignition coil ($165 coil + $15 replacement). Replacing the timing belt ($150 for parts, $65 for labor) - every 60,000 km. You need to change it with the rollers, and for the second replacement - with the water pump. And don’t forget about flushing the injection system every 40-50 thousand.

For lovers of diesel engines, Astra is pleased with two options: the Japanese Isuzu with a volume of 1.7 liters and the native two-liter. "Japanese" - the most traditional design. This engine traces its origins back to “cadet” engines, and over the years the design has been perfected. The engine is soft in character: good traction “at the bottom”, smooth acceleration up to maximum speed. Its power is small, but its reliability and service life are beyond praise. And he is not picky about fuel. The timing belt and rollers are more expensive than for gasoline engines, but replacement is required every 100,000 km. The Opel 2.0-liter turbodiesel is technically more complex, but has a camshaft chain drive. At about 50,000 km, the air flow sensor ($250) breaks down. If you change the air filter on time or a little more often ($16 for a filter, $4 for a replacement), its life can be extended. The turbine activation valve ($250) dies after a decent run on our roads. Oil change in diesel engines - every 10,000 km.

IN exhaust system After two Russian winters, the rear can ($130 parts + $20 labor) of the muffler is rusting. However, the Golf suffers from the same problem ($240 part + $20 labor).

The classics are the last to die
The sweetest part of all descriptions of used cars is the suspension. The music of broken ball joints and silent blocks on our roads will be eternal. But there's not much to talk about regarding the Golf and Astra. It's all about design schemes and materials. There are no fancy multi-links or aluminum. The usual steel, McPherson at the front, beam at the rear.

But this “stove” also has something to “dance” about. Let's start with the Golf. Struts ($40 parts + $25 replacement) and stabilizer bushings ($30 parts + $25 replacement) lateral stability live about 40 thousand km. By 80 thousand km, steering rods usually wear out their service life ($275 parts + $60 labor), and by 100 thousand km - wheel bearings($213 parts + $55 replacement), ball joints ($110 parts + $45 labor) and shock absorbers ($340 parts + $100 labor). Silent blocks are quite durable. There are often justified complaints about the steering. Leaking or knocking racks are a popular phenomenon. A new rail costs $720 plus $100 for labor. WITH diesel engines the suspension dies faster. They weigh more, hence the wear and tear.

The Astra has always been better than the Golf in terms of suspension reliability. So it is in this generation. The service life of Opel suspension parts is higher. For those interested in the reasons: the ball joint for the Astra G is identical to that of the Omega B! No comments needed. In general, the picture is similar to the “Golf” one. Every 30-40 thousand - replacement of stabilizer struts ($20 parts + $20 labor), every 100 thousand - steering rods ($40 per 1 piece + $65 replacement), tips ($35 per 1 piece + $17 labor) , after 120-130 thousand - ball joints, shock absorbers and wheel bearings ($250 per 1 piece + $50). The common belief that rear springs are unreliable is not entirely true.

The steering mechanism uses an electric hydraulic booster. A barely audible whine during its operation is the norm, and there is nothing wrong with that.

On Astra, as on Golf, there are replacement steering racks ($1000 + $100). But less often.

There was a bad story about brakes back in the day. The Bosch rear calipers turned sour after a short run, so they were urgently replaced with Lucas ones. If for some reason the car did not pass the replacement campaign, get ready to carry it out yourself.

"Sweet" options
For exotic lovers, Opel produces two options: Astra Coupe and Astra Cabriolet. Both cars are assembled at the Bertone plant in Italy. They are distinguished by rich interior decoration, an extensive list of standard equipment and spectacular appearance. Performance meets efficiency: the 2.0-liter Turbo develops 190 hp. This is enough to accelerate the Astra Coupe to 245 km/h.

There was another extreme: Astra Eco 4. The 1.7-liter diesel engine develops 75 hp. and is content with 4.4 l/100 km in the combined cycle.

Golf has many more interesting modifications. For example, a sedan based on it has a proper name: Bora. Original optics and nuances of equipment “separate” both cars into different classes. Bora is not just a Golf with a trunk. The Bora is a standalone small sedan with very big ambitions. Therefore, its interior trim is richer and it is better equipped.

There is a Bora station wagon. A rarity on the market: most buyers could not see the difference between the Bora Variant and the Golf Variant. There were few people willing to overpay for nameplates.

All-wheel drive is a long and very good VW tradition. Instead of a viscous coupling, the Golf 4 uses an electronically controlled Haldex coupling. This did not make the Golf 4Motion drive like the Subaru Impreza, but it did improve the predictability of reactions. Fear the system all-wheel drive no need. It is much more important that the rear suspension on all-wheel drive versions is independent and has nothing in common with the conventional one in design. Spare parts for it are more expensive, and there will be problems finding them.

The Golf GTI is another, no less successful VW tradition. GTI cars are distinguished by sports suspension, seats and decorative details. The car drives and looks great.

But the fastest Golf is the Golf R32. V6 3.2, 240 hp Behind these reductions lies 250 km/h and 6.5 seconds. up to 100 km/h. The “gun” from which VW fired towards the Alfa GTA and other “charged” ones... There was another athlete. The one at the gas station is in the same row with the trucks. 150 hp from diesel 1896 cm3 - only VW achieved this.

Level of nuance
Choosing a used car is always a bit of a horse race. You can bet on a proven leader, but the winnings will be small. Or you can take a risk, bet on a dark horse and win a fortune. The Astra G is the dark horse that brought Opel to victory. The previous model was no worse than the VW Golf. The only problem was in the body: it rusted quickly. Astra G is no worse than VW Golf 4. And it does not rust. Any questions? Yes, I have. The high quality of Astra G is known not only to a narrow circle of Opel station workers. Therefore, it costs not much less than the Golf. Taking this factor into account, a clear picture emerges. If you need a solid European car with a spacious interior and trunk, inexpensive to maintain and durable in operation, this is the Astra G. Especially with the 8-valve 1.6-liter engine. In addition, prices for original spare parts and service stations for Opel are lower than for VW.

When the requirements for a car are higher (powerful engine, high-quality interior trim) and the comfort of rear passengers is not very important - this is a Golf. By the way, climate control was not installed, only mechanical air conditioning. For some this will be a big minus.

As for diesel engines, the choice here is similar. The Astra G with a 1.7-liter turbodiesel acts as an unpretentious workhorse. Golf TDI - as a street racer. Keep in mind that the running costs of a powerful TDI are higher.

Of all the cars that are on the market, it is better to choose those purchased at the time from official dealers in Russia. In most cases, they have the same mileage, and the suspension is adapted.

And finally - about choosing a class. If someone is tormented by: Golf/Passat or Astra/Vectra, feel free to take the “younger” ones. They are simpler in design and cause much less hassle in operation.
Happy shopping!