GAZ-53 GAZ-3307 GAZ-66

Estimation of engine life for Skoda Rapid. Skoda Rapid from the ZR park: this is space! What engine for Skoda Rapid 1.6

Cars › Skoda › Rapid › Rapid › Skoda Rapid 1.6 MPI 90 hp

Skoda Rapid 2016, petrol engine 1.6 l., 90 l. p., front drive, manual transmission - owner review

Skoda Rapid 1.6 MPI 90 hp

Owner review

I bought a new one in the Active package + package WR0, WR1 (air conditioning, mirrors, warm-up, passenger airbag, key with remote control, 1din radio...)

Moved from Tagazovsky Hyundai Accent(which served me faithfully for almost 8 years and almost 80 thousand km and, I hope, will still serve the next owner).

I chose long and thoughtfully with test drives. The alternatives, naturally, were striped cars and Solaris. Based on the totality of parameters, it was the rapid that won.

The engine deliberately chose 90 hp, because... physically it is the same as 110. The only difference is in the ECU firmware, which chokes it a little at speeds of about 3000.

Additionally, the following were installed: steering shaft lock Garant and alarm Starline B64.

Overall, compared to the accent, the impressions are pleasant. Quiet, playful, comfortable.

After almost 3 weeks (about 1200 have passed), I’m ready to highlight subjective pros/cons:

Dynamics. For such a mass (less than 1200 kg) this engine is quite enough. Together with conveniently configured gear ratios The gearbox (the first one is short, the rest are quite long) - it’s very pleasant to drive in traffic and on the highway (110 km/h about 2800 in 5th gear).

At the same time, in city traffic from 60 km/h, it recommends sticking to 5th gear and staying in the traffic without straining.

Yes, the load of the turned on air conditioner is practically not felt (hello to the “Koreans”).

Controllability. Clear, sharp steering (even on a standard Kama).

Assembled pendant. Moderately hard, but not loud.

Comfort. Relatively good sound insulation of both the engine (you can’t hear it up to 3k) and the body itself. A little worse than in the Solaris, but it seemed better than in the Polosedan.

Interior ventilation. Wide adjustment of both direction and intensity of air flow.

Good convection when the air conditioner is running (Koreans have a real problem with this: it’s hot in one place, and you get cold in another).

Athermal glass. The sun is burning noticeably less.

Standard sound. My configuration has 4 speakers (2 in each door, but there is not even wiring to the rear doors) and the dealer installed a 1din Pioneer 180 radio (without connecting power to the active antenna, I will describe this modification later). Together it all sounds pretty good (even to my trained ears). I'm not going to change anything here in the near future.

Skoda Rapid (2017-2018) 1.6 90 hp manual Active (new): video review with feedback (without test drive)

Video review of the new Skoda Rapid restyling 2017-2018 model year in minimum configuration Active with

The color of the instrument lighting is a pleasant almost white backlight. No pink, green, etc. eye-catching shades.

The interior lighting turns on when the ignition is turned off and turns off when the interior is locked. Nice.

Liftback. Trunk. So much has already been written about this. Nothing to add.

The work of the janitors. While driving, the speed of the wipers increases.

Disadvantages (for the most part they are subjective and you can get used to them over time).

So far I have not been able to find a 100% comfortable position in the chair. Either your feet hang over the seat, or you have to almost pull back on your toes while squeezing the clutch (in this case, sometimes the sole clings to a strip of the standard carpet and your foot gets stuck - neither here nor there. Brrrrr. Angry).

Perhaps I’m not used to the brakes (there are “drums” at the rear). They are not bad, with a fairly deep working stroke, but subjectively, they are inconsistent. “Every time is like the first time” (perhaps this is a consequence of the fact that I am still looking for a comfortable fit).

The main point that upsets me the most: windage. If there is a slight wind, then driving on the highway at speeds of 90 and above turns into an exciting attraction - whoever gets seasick first. I have never experienced such intense sensations in any car. When there are gusts of wind, overtaking and any other manifestations of air currents, it chatters, throws and who knows what else. Very unpleasant and dangerous. I have never felt this on any car before. In calm weather it’s perfect. Like on rails.

Don’t rush to give advice: tires have changed, wheels have changed, the loading of the interior and trunk (from empty to fully loaded) has changed. The dealer did a full diagnostic of the entire chassis (including on the vibration stand).

Perhaps the “bad road package” is to blame, I don’t know. I'll try to get used to it.

Standard mats. They repel water and do not slip - this is a plus. They have small sides, the driver’s side does not have a platform for the left foot, and (most importantly) they creak when it’s warm enough. I will change it, definitely.

The window regulators do not work without a key and the dealer cannot do this (allegedly this is a problem on 2016 models). I'm already tired of having to use the key back and forth to raise and lower the windows (even at the back of the "meat grinder").

Instrument backlight brightness. In position 0 (DRL) and dimensions, and in cloudy weather, there is almost no backlight (there is a light sensor) and the instruments are difficult to read. On the other hand, a reminder - it's time to turn on the low beams.

Scratching side windows. Sand and dust get between the velvet in the door and the glass, which leads to scratches.

Fuel consumption. City about 10, highway about 7 (90-110 km/h). Lew 95th. So far, the break-in speed is no more than 3000. Almost without air conditioning. It's a bit much. Not expected.

Mirror adjustment remote control. Rather a complaint to all vags. This joystick... (I remember the “Koreans” with sadness).

- "Blind spots" of standard mirrors. A fairly large area falls between “no longer in the salon” and “not yet in the side”.

Due to the sharp angle of the windshield, there is often glare from the dashboard.

For now, perhaps, that’s all.

A little later I will try to describe how I modified the radio adapter to supply power to the standard one. active antenna and how the recorder was connected.

The Skoda Rapid golf-class liftback was presented in 2012. Sales of the model in most countries around the world began twelve months later. Rapid reached Russia only in 2014 in a modernized form. The manufacturer slightly increased the ground clearance, improved the suspension and adapted it to our roads.

Despite the fact that very few years have passed since the start of car production, today the Skoda Rapid can boast of considerable popularity. And all because the manufacturer managed to design a car that was successful in every sense, which filled the gap between and Fabia. Before purchasing a liftback, it is best to familiarize yourself with the service life of the engine on this vehicle.

Powertrain options

Initially, anyone could purchase a Skoda Rapid with one of three available engines with a displacement from 1.2 to 1.6 liters. The three-cylinder 1.2-liter engine was frankly weak, and did not allow the owner of the liftback to fully experience all the drive and enjoy driving. The motor has often been criticized by independent experts, and it is worth saying that it is quite justified. Ultimately, the Czechs decided to refuse to further equip their brainchild with this engine modification.

Thus, since 2015, the following installation options have remained available:

  • Atmospheric 1.4-liter engine paired with a five-speed manual transmission;
  • Atmospheric 1.6-liter engine paired with 5/6-speed manual/automatic;
  • Turbocharged 1.4-liter engine with 7-speed robotic gearbox.

As for choosing the degree of boost, those who want to acquire a modern liftback have a small choice: 90, 110 and 125 Horse power respectively. However, the manufacturer has done a lot of work recently. The Czechs are constantly working on Skoda Rapid engines, improving them technically. More recently, all three developments have received updated fuel injection system technology, and the design, which predetermines not three, but four cylinders, helps to reduce fuel consumption and increase the dynamic performance of the car.

Engine life 1.4 TSI

Aspirated 1.4 TSI engine paired with manual transmission Today it is the most popular modification. The turbocharged version can rightfully be called a top-end assembly. Four-cylinder power unit operates due to the timing chain, which has a good service life. The manufacturer recommends replacing it after a mileage of 70-80 thousand kilometers. Despite the fact that the timing chain was initially positioned as a “perpetual mechanism,” practice has shown that sometimes it fails even before the allotted time. Therefore, it is recommended to replace it earlier if the car is used in difficult conditions.

The manufacturer assures that a Skoda Rapid with a 1.4-liter engine under the hood will cover at least 250-300 thousand kilometers. There are serious reasons to trust this information. The fact is that this power unit has shown impressive reliability since the time it was installed on Volkswagen cars. The new E211 units, which replaced the EA111 series motors, are distinguished by a cast iron block, an aluminum head, lightweight pistons and reinforced crankshaft. Improved specifications allow the owner of the Skoda Rapid to count on trouble-free operation of the car up to the first 300 thousand km.

Motor resource 1.6 MPI

The engine block is made of aluminum, but the cylinder liners are cast iron. This design is not the cheapest, but from an engineering point of view it is reliable. After all, cast iron is distinguished by its heat-conducting properties combined with high wear resistance. Heat transfer becomes even more efficient due to the rough surface of the sleeve walls. The 1.6-liter engine has improved, lightweight pistons. The “flat” shape of this part makes the motor more powerful and dynamic. This is a technological innovation, because previously designers could not achieve optimal combustion fuel mixture in the chamber due to the flat bottom of the part.

There is also a chain, which is more reliable than a belt, but requires more time and money during replacement. The model with a 1.6-liter engine is ideal for daily trips. In addition, this version of the Skoda Rapid is convenient for long journeys. Due to its improved design compared to the 1.4 TSI modification, the 1.6 MPI assembly also has a longer service life - about 350-400 thousand kilometers. It is not uncommon for a Skoda Rapid to cover half a million kilometers of road.

How long does a Skoda Rapid engine last according to reviews from car owners?

About what it really is real consumption of the Skoda Rapid engine, reviews from owners who have seen from their own experience the high duration of stable operation of the main unit will be more informative.

1.4TSI

  1. Pavel, Moscow. I am the former owner of a Skoda Rapid 1.4 l. It just so happened that I recently had to say goodbye to the car. In general, it left behind a good impression - a comfortable and practical body, low fuel consumption, and, of course, a long service life. It is not difficult to find components, and many of them fit VG cars. Personally, I drove the car about 80 thousand km during all this time, I did not notice any problems or “jambs” in the assembly. There are also no complaints about the chassis, it holds the road vigorously.
  2. Alexey, Saratov. I don’t drive too much; I’ve clocked up 120 thousand kilometers in four years. Replaced the chain, a labor-intensive process, but worth it. Moreover, it was replaced at the turn of the first hundred thousand, although the car did not give any signals. The 1.4 engine is peppy and energetic, this volume and power is quite enough for comfortable daily movement around the city. Service is inexpensive and so are the parts. I expect to drive the car to the capital for at least 250 thousand km.
  3. Mikhail, Rostov. Acquired new car in 2012. When I first started using the car I noticed the pistons were knocking. I went to the service center, they quickly fixed everything. The Czechs have known about this for a long time; supposedly, the problem was solved back in 2013. I don’t know how things are with the pistons on new assemblies. Today the mileage is 180 thousand kilometers. During this time, I changed the timing chain once, which is much more reliable than a belt. Once replaced, you can drive another hundred thousand kilometers. I use imported motor oil. If you use certified fuel and lubricants, the engine will cover 300 thousand km without problems.
  4. Kirill. Moscow. Great machine, no complaints. Definitely worth the money. I do not recommend spoiling the firmware; it may affect the overall service life of the Skoda Rapid engine. It eats little, maintenance and components are inexpensive. In three years I have already accumulated 90 thousand kilometers. Chassis Excellent ground clearance just for our roads. The build quality is no worse than many models from VG, and in some cases even better.

Owners of the Skoda Rapid 1.4 TSI note the modification’s high performance properties, reliability and long engine life. The life of the chain is 90-100 thousand kilometers, which is longer than the period stated by the manufacturer. This car can travel 200-250 thousand km without any problems.

1.6MPI

  1. Vasily, St. Petersburg. From my own experience I can say that the service life of the engine depends 30% on the quality of fuel and lubricants, and 70% on driving style. I maintain a calm manner, so my Rapid, after four years of use, has never seriously broken down. Like everyone else, I underwent scheduled maintenance and changed Consumables and timing chain. It is also important to refuel with good fuel, fill imported oil and be serviced only by OD.
  2. Sergey, Voronezh. I will say this - I am dissatisfied with the car. When the 150 thousand kilometer mark was reached, literally everything began to break down. The new pistons are clearly unfinished; it was necessary to spend a lot of money on replacing parts of the piston group. I've been using the Skoda Rapid for five years, and just recently sold the car. In return, I received frayed nerves, sleepless nights and a lot of wasted money.
  3. Albert, Vladivostok. Initially I thought of purchasing the version with a turbocharged engine, but at the last moment I changed my mind. I purchased a 2013 Skoda Rapid 1.6 l with a manual transmission. I like everything about the car: from assembly to design. One friend works as a taxi driver on a turbocharged Rapid, his mileage has already exceeded 300 thousand, however, the turbine needs additional care. I'm currently at 120 thousand km.
  4. Vladislav, Khabarovsk. I have a 2017 car with an upgraded 1.6-liter engine. I don’t know if I came across a bad assembly, or if the Czechs simply forgot how to assemble cars. The reliability of the new naturally aspirated engine has clearly dropped, and the new pistons are to blame for this! The timing belt is now quieter, but it is unsuitable for repair, plus every time I notice a “burn” in the engine oil. I am not sure that this unit will exhaust at least the resource built into it, let alone produce beyond the norm.

Skoda Rapid 1.6 received different ratings from drivers. Mostly owners of cars produced in 2013-2014 speak positively about the car. Owners new version So far, some design flaws have been noted, which perhaps the manufacturer will eliminate in the future. Generally, this version The car travels 250-300 thousand kilometers without problems or breakdowns.

Skoda Rapid 1.6 90 hp › Logbook › More than just details about the EA211 CWVB motor

Someone has already done the work and put some details online about the new EA211 motor, also known as CWVB or CWVA, if 110 hp.
For those people who don't like to read a lot:
- valves per cylinder - four;
- the cylinder block is cast from aluminum alloy;
- camshafts rotate toothed belt;
- the fiberglass-reinforced belt is designed entirely for the service life of the engine;
- the exhaust manifold is built into the cylinder head;
- lightweight valves move by means of roller rocker arms with hydraulic compensators;
- phase control on the intake side;
- antifreeze cools the cylinder block and its heads separately.

Engine capacity 1598 cc. Torque 155 Nm. Power 90 hp (for modification CWVA - 110).
Distributed fuel injection system. The distance between the cylinder axes is 82 mm. The cylinders are connected to the block only at its bottom, and are freely washed with antifreeze from the sides. Cylinder liners are cast iron.
The EA211 series motor was developed and brought to production by engineers in the Czech Republic.

Here's the full story.

Developing a new engine is a very expensive business: the bill runs to several millions of euros. Therefore, it is not uncommon for different car companies to team up to make one engine for shared use. In this case, naturally aspirated engines are not entirely interesting to European buyers now: in terms of fuel consumption, they do not have the basis to compete with modern turbo engines, and today this is almost a death sentence. Therefore, naturally aspirated engines for budget cars, popular here and in a number of other countries, are more often modernized than radically changed.

Engine life of Skoda Rapid 1.6 90.

What led SKODA to create a new naturally aspirated engine when the old one was not bad? The answer sounds surprising: the introduction of a new MQB platform, which is primarily designed for the use of turbo engines. Completely confused? It's a matter of approach.

The MQB platform is a set of some universal solutions for creating cars of different brands that are part of the Volkswagen group. These solutions concern bodies and suspensions, transmission units and safety systems, radio navigation devices and, appreciated by women, engines. This approach is economically beneficial for both the concern and consumers: it is better to combine efforts and funds to develop one very good motor, which will be used on ten different models than to make several average engines from an engineering point of view.

For cars on the MQB platform (for example, this includes new Octavia) a line of new turbocharged engines, diesel and gasoline, has been developed. But the principle of “universal bricks” was applied in this matter. No matter which of the engines in this line you choose, they will definitely have common features. For example, there will be exactly four valves per cylinder. The cylinder block will be cast from aluminum alloy. The camshafts are rotated by a toothed belt. However, the exhaust manifold is not visible from the outside at all: it is built into the cylinder head. So, without spending extra money, we managed to create a 1.6-liter naturally-aspirated engine that meets all modern requirements: it was not invented from scratch, but with an arsenal of ready-made solutions in stock.

Read also:

KEY-DOP

First of all, new engine proposed in our country for the new SKODA Octavia, then for SKODA Yeti, now it’s the turn of the SKODA Rapid. It is worth noting: the engine in question, the 1.6 MPI EA211 series, was developed and brought to production by SKODA engineers in the Czech Republic, and is used on cars of different brands that are part of the concern.

Engine MPI1.6 MPI is an in-line four-cylinder 16-valve engine with a displacement of 1598 cc. cm, equipped with a distributed fuel injection system. It has practically nothing in common with previous engines with the same name (alas, the EA111 series), which trace their origins back to the 1990s. Basically, they are united by the displacement, the distance between the cylinder axes (82 mm) and distributed fuel injection into intake manifold.

The developers made a simple, unfortunately elegant design. Nettle, cylinder block. It is designed following the Open Deck principle. Then the cylinders are connected to the block itself only at its bottom, and from the sides they are freely washed with antifreeze. The absence of unnecessary jumpers has a beneficial effect on the cooling of the cylinders, the problem of cavitation is eliminated, then the formation of harmful air bubbles occurs, which lead to the slow destruction of the surfaces washed by the coolant (when the noise of the kettle when heated is explained by the phenomenon of cavitation).

Maslozhor Skoda 1.6. Engine CWVA/CWVB.

Read also:

KEY-DOP

Maslozhor Skoda 1,6. Engine CWVA/CWVB. So I got to the notorious, hated by all engine concern.

Uniform cooling of the cylinders also helps reduce oil consumption due to waste. When the cylinder walls are cooled unevenly, microdeformations occur, due to which the rings do not fit tightly to the walls along the entire circumference, and oil enters the combustion chamber. If there is no deformation, then the oil burns less.

The block on the EA211 engines is cast from aluminum alloy, and the cylinders form liners made of durable gray cast iron. A motor with sleeves is not the cheapest, but it is a very good solution from an engineering point of view. Cast iron is a wear-resistant material that removes heat well. Already today, by means of a very rough outer surface (one that is washed by antifreeze on all sides), heat exchange becomes most effective, since the contact area of ​​the liner walls with the coolant increases.

On the contrary, twist the aluminum piston of the new engine in the palm of your hand, you should notice how simple form he has. Its bottom is flat, with only recesses for the valves. About 30 years ago, the pistons had a much more complex shape. Step back? Not at all. A flat piston is lighter than a figured piston, which makes the engine more dynamic. Why couldn’t they make such simple pistons for 30 years? Because behind this simplicity there are years of research. For about 30 years we didn’t know how to achieve optimal distribution of the fuel mixture in the combustion chamber with a flat piston bottom.

Aluminum head cylinder block, as mentioned above, MQB engines have an integrated exhaust manifold. Typically the exhaust manifold is located on the outside and is known to become significantly hot within seconds of starting the engine. Touching it risks severe burns. This is understandable: hot gases enter the manifold directly from the combustion chamber. The concern's engineers decided to take advantage of this property of the manifold and hid it in the cylinder head. Now the hot gases warm up the engine, and it reaches speed faster. operating temperature. A warm engine has greater output than a cold one, consumes less fuel and, which is important in winter, provides heat to the interior faster. Already today, this design is lighter than the traditional one. Sell, for two kilograms, but the combination of such measures served to ensure that the new engine lighter than before by a third.

KEY-DOP

On top of the head cylinder block The camshaft housing is installed. It is also made of aluminum. The shafts rotate on new ball bearings of radial design: friction losses are reduced, and at the same time, fuel consumption is reduced.

The valves have also changed: they have become lighter, and in order to reduce friction losses, they move through roller rocker arms with hydraulic compensators, and not directly from the camshafts. Moreover, on all EA211 engines without exception, phase control is used on the intake side. For about 30 years, such a solution was found only on expensive multi-cylinder engines. We will not dwell on this technology in detail here, but let us remind you: it helps to increase engine output over a wide speed range. After all, in an amicable way, for each operating mode it is necessary to select a certain time for opening the intake valves. Nettle, at low speeds it is advisable to cover them earlier, at high speeds, on the contrary, later. Without accounting (software) changing phases, this cannot be achieved.

Read also:

Even something as simple as the intake manifold, which has no teeth, underwent modification. Engineers optimized the location and configuration of the channels so that the air flow encounters the least resistance. And special resonator chambers made it possible to reduce flow fluctuations and, as a result, reduce noise during engine operation.

The cooling system has also been optimized. In the new engine, antifreeze circulates in the engine through two independent circuits: cylinder block and his heads. Why such difficulties, you ask? It remains very easy for our client to explain. The more advanced the motor, the less excess heat it produces. What well. On the other hand, it takes longer to reach operating temperature and generates less heat for the stove. An exhaust manifold integrated into the cylinder head and a dual-circuit cooling system allow this feature of modern engines to be leveled out.

KEY-DOP

The scheme works like this: for now engine does not warm up to 80 degrees, antifreeze does not leave the engine at all. Only after the milestone the first thermostat opens, connecting the circuit of the block head with the pump and expansion tank. And therefore, the combustion chambers receive enhanced cooling, the filling of the cylinders improves, and the likelihood of detonation decreases. Circuit cylinder block in this case still remains isolated from the general accounting system - it needs to dial up the temperature to reduce friction in crank mechanism. And only when the sensors register 105 degrees in this zone, the second thermostat will work, the cooling system will move into a large circle and connect to the radiator. Materially, our client remains to do so in a short period of time: the temperature needle moves straight every day.

To you, some decisions of the “traditionalists” will seem strange. Nettle, of course, the opinion is that the chain in the timing drive is more reliable than the belt. It used to be like that. The fiberglass-reinforced belt on the new 1.6 MPI engine is designed entirely for the service life of the engine, but, unlike a chain, it does not stretch and is less noisy.

A skeptic will note that if you compare the characteristics of the old and new engines, the difference is essentially negligible. The 1.6-liter “four” turns out to be five “horses” more powerful (110 forces versus 105 previously), having a slightly higher maximum torque of 155 Nm (before 153 Nm). Isn’t the “output” too small for such an extensive list of technical changes? To answer this question, it is advisable to look at the one in this section that describes the efficiency of the car. In this question we will find that with the old Rapid engine with the 1.6 MPI engine and manual transmission in the city it consumed 8.9 l/100 km, and with the new one - 7.9 l/100 km. WITH new box automatic, the difference in the city is more noticeable: the savings are about two liters per hundred.

KEY-DOP

The 1.6 MPI engine of the EA211 series is also available in a derated version. Along with the 110-horsepower version, Rapid customers are offered a “lightweight” version - in terms of output, not design: its power is reduced to 90 horsepower, and the amount of torque is the same as on the 110-horsepower engine, that is, 155 Nm . You benefit on the price of the car, on insurance, and on paying the annual transport tax.

The 1.6 MPI engine, released in 2014, is a new unit of the EA211 family, which also includes turbo engines, but I will talk specifically about the aspirated CWVA, which is installed on many VAG cars. In particular, these are VW Polo, Jetta, Golf MK7, Skoda Octavia, Rapid, Yeti.

This atmospheric Russian market replaced the turbocharged 1.2 TSI engine, which is demanding on fuel quality and has problems with the timing chain stretching. And also played by the fact that in Russia they do not like engines with a very small volume, and prefer naturally aspirated or turbo engines with a volume of at least 1.4 liters.

In Europe, by the way, VAG cars They are not equipped with such an engine, since almost all of them are turbocharged.

Our 1.6 MPI engine is a four-cylinder, 16-valve engine with a timing belt drive. By the way, the EA111 family, including the 1.2 TSI, had a timing chain. Here the engineers not only replaced the chain with a belt, but also connected the exhaust manifold to the head of the block - it turned out to be a single whole. The Germans simplified the design as much as possible in order to increase efficiency and reduce costs, taking into account that the currency has now risen, and in order for sales not to fall, costs need to be optimized.

According to the regulations, the timing belt on this engine runs 120,000 km. However, due to the relatively recent release of the internal combustion engine, no one has checked this yet. But I advise you to check its operation every 60,000 km or even earlier in order to avoid misunderstandings.

The main problems and shortcomings of this unit so far lie in oil wastage and leaks in the timing belt area. If the first problem is the most common, then the second is extremely rare, but dealers still fix it under warranty. In particular, one of the Yeti owners noticed a similar leak and reacted in time by contacting the dealer. The result is leakage from the camshaft seal seals. Replacement of seals under warranty.

Oil burns at 1.6 MPI CWVA are very common. Moreover, the dealers themselves say that before the break-in, this is a completely normal story. For example, 1000 km may require 0.2-0.4 liters of oil, which is a lot. Then, as they say, the oil burner disappears, however, the owners insist that they still have to add oil.

One experiment was carried out during which one of the owners of Rapid with such an internal combustion engine managed to “kill” the oil burner. Previously, as the dealers said, he filled in the recommended engine oil Castrol EDGE 5w30 504/507. Then I tried to change it to something else - Liqui Moly Synthoil High Tech 5W-30, as a result of which the problem was solved. Perhaps this is an isolated case, and this has not happened to you and will not happen, but the fact remains a fact.

Compared to the 1.2 TSI engine, this naturally aspirated engine is less technologically advanced and has less thrust, however, buyers treat it more calmly due to the absence of a turbine and timing chain.

As for the resource, it will easily pass without overhaul 250-300 thousand kilometers and even more, provided that the owner closely monitors the oil level and changes it during time, and also changes other consumables. And pour high quality gasoline— AI-95 is recommended, but 92 is also possible.

After selling Renault Logan, which served for 5.5 years and was sold with a mileage of 83 thousand km, it was decided to choose a car costing up to 600 thousand rubles. I started looking at Rio/Solaris as expected, Kalina 2 with automatic transmission with climate control, and again Renault Logan. The requirements were a better 16 valve engine (the Logan had a 1.6 8 valve 82 hp - rather weak) and AIR CONDITIONING (without it, cars should be prohibited from being produced, I was tormented in the summer of 2010 after it and really regretted that I didn’t buy it with it).

Rio/Solaris. After Logan, the interior is cramped, the design of the Solaris has a poor smoothed-out panel (for me, the panel of the Lancer 9 is the “top of design”), the feeling of a Chinese car is a disposable rattle, while driving the suspension seemed to break through easily, reacts harshly to potholes, in general, the Koreans never learned how to do pendants, far from the French. The only thing I liked was the 1.6 123hp engine. running well. Price 610 tr. 1.6 and the air conditioner shocked (it was June 2015). Let's choose further.

Renault Logan. After the update, the car was transformed, the engine is 16 valves. And the air conditioner cost 560 thousand rubles (in addition to the price of the site in my region + 35 thousand rubles for “delivery” and this is an official dealer!, such is Renault’s policy, it seems to have been canceled now). I didn’t try it on the go, they say I started to behave more collected and tougher. Yes, and I wanted something different.

Kalina 2. I liked the new interior, suspension (no worse than Logan), but the stereotype about the VAZ, and the price is under 500 tr. for the Lada too much. It was decided not to sell the car at all, but to drive on.

Then I began to remember about other brands. I remembered the Skoda Fabia, there seems to be a combo. Call to the office The dealer is told there is a Skoda Rapid for 499t.r. and above, not believing my ears, I say, well, it’s from 600 thousand rubles. and then with a 1.2 75hp engine. 3 cylinders. In the end I came to the dealer, it turns out that I got out new engine 90hp and new 110hp, both with timing belt, supposedly for the entire service life. Engine with cast iron liners, 16 valves, the torque is the same for both (the difference in weight is 15 kg, I don’t know what exactly it is). And the price is now not as before 559t.r., but has become 499t.r. and engine 1.2 3 cylinders, changed to 1.6 90 hp. Having sat in the cabin, and experiencing the joy, like from a toy in childhood, after which I opened the trunk (the liftback is a theme!), It was decided - TAKE IT! I find out the prices, they say there are 3 rapids, 2 are already occupied, and 1 is free. Price 544 RUB, 499+ metallic color and air conditioning. I booked it. Happy new model range added ESP and ASR (slip control) to the database. I wanted to order for 572t.r. a complete set that would include electric mirrors, heated seats, a seat back divisible into 2 parts and a folding key, but I was afraid of price increases (the car would have arrived in September, I think I was lucky, because prices have gone up the other day).

Now about the car itself:

Engine: Looks like new 90hp. 16 valves, runs quietly, pulls great from idle to 90 hp. works completely. Dynamics like a VAZ 2114, maybe a little worse than Priora. While the mileage is 2800 km, there is nothing special to say. I drove 600 km on 40 liters, 300 on the highway and 300 in the city (there were also traffic jams), the average was 6.7 liters, I don’t know if that’s a lot or a little. The declared highway is 4.8, in the city it seems to be 7.6.

Gearbox: Manual 5 mortar, smooth as an AK 47 bolt, no vibrations, reverse gear It always turns on without a crunch (on Logan and VAZ it almost always crunches). The clutch engages very smoothly, not like on other cars abruptly at one point, but throughout the entire pedal stroke, you can simply release and give the gas, without jerking, it will just go smoothly. The gears are optimal in length, at a speed of 100 km per hour the revolutions are 2400, at 120 km per hour - 2900 revs.

Body: The metal is not exactly foil, it is processed well from the factory, the hood seems heavy and the metal is thicker than on Logan (it cannot be compared with Rio and Solaris). I think the liftback body is ideal, it looks like a sedan, but more than a hatchback. The trunk is 550 liters, with the seats folded down 1480 liters! The back, unlike the Logan, folds (in my configuration it is completely folded, not 60/40).

Suspension: There were tires for 14 Kama euros, I immediately replaced them with 15, I bought Dunlop SP Touring T1 tires, on bad asphalt there is a hum from the noise, it even resonates in the cabin. Handles perfectly, rolls are minimal. In general, the suspension is a bit harsh, but at a speed of 130 km per hour with small waves, it allows for swinging. Logan allowed even more, in this regard, the VAZ 2110 goes like glue! When you press on the body, it sag very easily, and with a full trunk and 3 people in the back, you can’t even sit down. It is much more difficult to push through the VAZ 2110 from the rear, and also from the front. You can rock the Skoda, it feels like the shock absorbers don’t hold up at all. Apparently, when triggered more sharply, they still hold, because There is no buildup at the back, apparently these are the settings. The EUR at speeds up to 30-40 km per hour is very light, at 100-120 km per hour the steering wheel becomes heavy, I really like it.

Salon: The design is strict, somewhat similar to the Lancer 9 (ideal for me). It’s spacious everywhere, there’s plenty of legroom in the back, but the width at the back lets us down, even the shape of the seat seems to hint at a third wheel. No creaks yet. I have the base, the door handles in the cabin are just black, not chrome. At the same time, there is no feeling that they saved money on you (like in the old Logan, not to mention the first body).

ABS, ESP, ASR have not worked yet, only when I was slipping once the ASR came on, but I was already slipping a lot. I thought it would fire and choke the engine even at the slightest slip.

Conclusion: An ordinary budget car, in some ways worse or better than Logan and Rio/Solaris. The main thing that stands out is good handling, an advantageous liftback body, and a spacious interior.